Bump parquet from 1.16.0 to 1.17.0

[Jackie-Jiang]

Fix the way to identify the INT96 field

The old way breaks because of this bug fix: apache/parquet-java#3311
The name of the field is no longer "INT96"

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR upgrades the Parquet library from version 1.16.0 to 1.17.0 and addresses a breaking change in how INT96 fields are identified. The upgrade was necessary due to a bug fix in parquet-java (PR #3311) that changed the field name representation for INT96 types.

Changes:

• Bumped parquet version from 1.16.0 to 1.17.0 in the root POM
• Updated INT96 field identification logic to check fixed-size byte arrays with documentation instead of relying on field names
• Improved code consistency by removing unnecessary fully qualified class names and adding defensive assertions

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File	Description
pom.xml	Updates parquet dependency version to 1.17.0
ParquetAvroRecordExtractor.java	Refactors INT96 detection logic to use fixed-size and documentation checks instead of field name comparison, removes unused import, and simplifies Schema type references

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 62.50000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.26%. Comparing base (c244cd3) to head (d117095).
⚠️ Report is 250 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nputformat/parquet/ParquetAvroRecordExtractor.java	62.50%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #17504   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     63.25%   63.26%           
+ Complexity     1477     1476    -1     
=========================================
  Files          3167     3167           
  Lines        189175   189177    +2     
  Branches      28948    28950    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits         119661   119678   +17     
+ Misses        60235    60202   -33     
- Partials       9279     9297   +18     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (ø)
integration	100.00% <ø> (ø)
integration1	100.00% <ø> (ø)
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	63.21% <62.50%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
java-21	63.22% <62.50%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
temurin	63.26% <62.50%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	63.25% <62.50%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests1	55.57% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests2	34.01% <62.50%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.