Skip to content

Add Loki Mode under Orchestrators and autonomous loops#121

Open
asklokesh wants to merge 1 commit into
bradAGI:mainfrom
asklokesh:add-loki-mode
Open

Add Loki Mode under Orchestrators and autonomous loops#121
asklokesh wants to merge 1 commit into
bradAGI:mainfrom
asklokesh:add-loki-mode

Conversation

@asklokesh

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds Loki Mode to the "Orchestrators & autonomous loops" section, placed by star count (971) between loom (1.3k) and Bernstein (559), matching the section's "Sorted by GitHub stars" convention. Entry uses the section's star-badge + separator format to stay consistent with neighboring entries.

What it is: a source-available (BUSL-1.1), CLI-first autonomous coding agent that takes a spec (PRD, GitHub issue, OpenAPI doc, or a one-line brief) toward a deployed product.

Why it fits the section and the inclusion criteria:

  • CLI / terminal interface: loki start ./prd.md, loki heal <path>, etc.
  • Reads/writes code and runs commands autonomously via a reason/act/reflect/verify loop.
  • Live, actively maintained project (current release v7.27.0).

What makes it distinct from existing entries: an explicit completion-verification gate. Most agents end a task on the model's self-report. Loki runs a blind-review completion council plus an evidence gate that can veto "done", so it keeps working (or asks for input) until the evidence is actually there.

Other specifics: brownfield/legacy healing via loki heal; local-first with your own API keys (no data egress); ships a 26-tool MCP server; reads AGENTS.md at the repo root. Provider-agnostic (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI, Cline, Aider).

Reproducible benchmark (available if useful, not led with): 98.78% on HumanEval (162/164), reproducible from the repo via benchmarks/run-benchmarks.sh humaneval --execute --loki.

Checked for duplicates: Loki Mode is not currently listed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant