Skip to content

Add wsgi.py analogous to asgi.py#145

Merged
hoodmane merged 1 commit into
cloudflare:mainfrom
hoodmane:hoodmane/wsgi
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Add wsgi.py analogous to asgi.py#145
hoodmane merged 1 commit into
cloudflare:mainfrom
hoodmane:hoodmane/wsgi

Conversation

@hoodmane

@hoodmane hoodmane commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/workers/wsgi.py
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/workers/wsgi.py
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/workers/wsgi.py
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/wsgi.py Outdated
@ryanking13

ryanking13 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for working on this. I think we need a proper testing strategy with enough coverage before merging this, as we release every commit. Otherwise, we can create a temporary branch that we can incrementally improve until we are confident enough to be merged to main.

Comment thread packages/runtime-sdk/src/workers/wsgi.py
@ryanking13

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I guess we should be able to this with my Django test suites. If currently uses ASGIHandler, but ideally just replacing it with WSGIHandler would mostly work.

@hoodmane hoodmane force-pushed the hoodmane/wsgi branch 4 times, most recently from cc9ed6e to 39ba025 Compare July 8, 2026 22:11
@hoodmane hoodmane merged commit 247f9ff into cloudflare:main Jul 8, 2026
12 checks passed
@hoodmane hoodmane deleted the hoodmane/wsgi branch July 8, 2026 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants