The first collaborative encyclopedia mapping the path from foundations to the frontier of science.
Built with agents, reviewed by experts. Each topic is a node, each prerequisite is an edge. Pick a frontier paper and see every concept you need to read it; pick a topic you already know and see where it leads.
- Agents draft. Vast research and topic exploration is what they're good at.
- Humans review. Domain experts approve content within their declared expertise — tracked publicly in
reviewers.yml. - GitHub is the source of truth. Topics, reviewer registry, and review-state all live in this repo. Each topic has a tracking issue; PRs reference it.
Charted's current focus is the prerequisite closure to read modern machine-learning papers — the foundations to climb to the frontier of ML/NLP. Topics outside that closure are archived (still in the repo, hidden from list views) until a frontier paper pulls them back in.
To extend scope, run the paper-ingestion script and add a frontier-tier topic:
npm run ingest:paper -- <arxivId> --anchor <topicId>It fetches arXiv metadata, computes prerequisite-closure overlap with the current MVP, and emits draft frontmatter plus authors.yml entries.
git clone https://github.com/codika-io/charted.git
cd charted
npm install
npm run devOpen http://localhost:4321. The dev server hot-reloads on file changes; predev regenerates the topic graph.
There are three ways to contribute, ordered by friction:
- In-page flag — every topic page exposes a "Flag" affordance next to the title, prerequisites, and sources. It opens a structured GitHub issue for maintainers (no GitHub account required).
- ORCID claim — if a topic cites a paper you authored, signing in with ORCID surfaces a "You're cited here" banner. One click opens a PR adding you to
reviewers.yml, verified end-to-end via ORCID +authors.yml. - Pull request — content PRs require reviewer attestation (
Reviewer-GitHub,Reviewer-ORCID,Reviewer-Tiertrailers). CI posts an advisory comment; final approval is a maintainer call.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full flow, including the unified topic/source model, reviewer tiers, and writing guidelines.
| File / dir | What it is |
|---|---|
src/content/topics/**.mdx |
Every topic. Frontmatter + MDX body. Schema in src/content.config.ts. |
reviewers.yml |
Canonical reviewer registry. CI parses this. |
authors.yml |
Paper-author registry referenced by sources[].authors on every topic. |
scripts/build-graph.mjs |
Pre-build step. Emits src/generated/graph.json with bidirectional closures. |
scripts/ingest-paper.mjs |
arXiv → closure overlap + frontmatter draft for adding a single new paper. |
scripts/source-wave.mjs |
OpenAlex → candidate paper list for a seed topic (recency + citation + first-author filters). Output goes to the operator for methodology review before any topic page is written. |
scripts/seed-issues.mjs |
One-time: creates a tracking issue per topic. |
scripts/archive-non-mvp.mjs |
One-time: marks non-MVP topics status: archived. |
src/components/islands/AtlasGraph.tsx |
Layered DAG visualization (ELK + React Flow). |
src/pages/atlas.astro |
Full atlas with three view modes. |
src/pages/contributors/[handle].astro |
Per-reviewer profile page. |
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md |
Required reviewer-attestation trailers. |
.github/workflows/review-check.yml |
Soft-enforced CI attestation check. |
Every paper cited on a topic page lists its authors by key — sources[].authors: [behrouz-2024, gui-2023, …]. Those keys resolve against authors.yml, which carries the author's display name, ORCID, current affiliation, h-index, and (optionally) public contact info. Keys use the convention <lastname>-<year-of-paper>, disambiguated when needed (song-rui-2023, yuan-wei-2023).
reviewers.yml is a separate registry of verified reviewers — domain experts who have signed off on one or more topic pages within their declared expertise. A reviewer entry includes their GitHub handle, ORCID, and the topic IDs they are attested for. When someone signs in via ORCID on the site and matches a key in authors.yml, they can one-click promote themselves into reviewers.yml via a PR.
The two files together encode the core invariant of the project: an agent can draft anything, but a topic page is only "reviewed" once at least one reviewers.yml entry attests to it.
Astro 5 · React 19 · Tailwind CSS 4 · KaTeX · React Flow · ELK · Departure Mono · Instrument Serif
Code: MIT. Content (src/content/): CC BY-SA 4.0.
