fix: Correct EnterpriseContractPolicy documentation link

[dheerajodha]

• Fixed broken documentation link for EnterpriseContractPolicy in configuration docs
• Link was pointing to CLI reference instead of ECC API reference
• Now includes direct anchor to EnterpriseContractPolicy section

resolves: EC-1650

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 73f7a8ef-a506-4c2f-b8d3-9c0756ec695d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da87ab2 and 5c7842c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/modules/ROOT/pages/configuration.adoc

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• docs/modules/ROOT/pages/configuration.adoc

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated an AsciiDoc cross-reference in the configuration documentation: the EnterpriseContractPolicy xref target was changed from the CLI module to the ECC module using a specific anchor, with link text and surrounding content unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Link Update docs/modules/ROOT/pages/configuration.adoc	Replaced the EnterpriseContractPolicy xref target xref:cli:ROOT:reference.adoc[EnterpriseContractPolicy] with xref:ecc:ROOT:reference.adoc#k8s-api-github-com-enterprise-contract-enterprise-contract-controller-api-v1alpha1-enterprisecontractpolicy[EnterpriseContractPolicy]; displayed text and context unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly and clearly summarizes the main change: correcting a broken documentation link for EnterpriseContractPolicy.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset, providing context about the broken link fix, the reason for the change, and the issue reference.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag	Coverage Δ
acceptance	55.16% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
generative	17.90% <ø> (ø)
integration	26.63% <ø> (ø)
unit	69.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[simonbaird]

Lgtm, but consider my suggestions.