docs(adr): design the Vibe Coding plugin (shape, skill family, stack guardrail, voice)#58
Conversation
…guardrail, voice) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 46 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds ADR-0003 for a new Vibe Coding plugin aimed at non-engineering users. The ADR defines an agent-and-skills bundle, three canonical skills sourced from Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Comment |
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/adr/0003-vibe-coding-plugin-design.md`:
- Around line 111-114: Update the “Child 4 — consume & E2E” acceptance criteria
to require E2E coverage for in-stack, out-of-stack, and missing or malformed
Stack map scenarios. For each case, assert the plain-language response and the
suggested issue payload, preserving the existing conversational small-app
validation.
- Around line 70-84: Update the Stack map section in ADR D3 to define its
required contract name and schema, including each building block’s purpose,
matching terms, and owning repository. Specify deterministic matching semantics
and fail-closed behavior when the map is absent, malformed, or has no match,
including a configured fallback issue owner and issue template so redirects
remain resolvable without an owning Stack entry.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c4dafc8d-8228-41cc-b528-b2742e5b07f6
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/adr/0003-vibe-coding-plugin-design.md
📜 Review details
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/adr/0003-vibe-coding-plugin-design.md
[style] ~26-~26: The double modal “needs mapped” is nonstandard (only accepted in certain dialects). Consider “to be mapped”.
Context: ...popular- assistant support (AC1), needs mapped to technical specifications behind the ...
(NEEDS_FIXED)
[style] ~129-~129: Consider an alternative for the overused word “exactly”.
Context: ...ed: voice and elicitation behaviour are exactly what agent definitions are for; skill...
(EXACTLY_PRECISELY)
[style] ~151-~151: To elevate your writing, try using a synonym here.
Context: ...tation in child 4. - Voice quality is hard to validate mechanically — manifest v...
(HARD_TO)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/adr/0003-vibe-coding-plugin-design.md (1)
1-69: LGTM!Also applies to: 85-110, 115-162
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 918d262968
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…very, both-sides E2E
![botantler-1[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1025824?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d66c9a85d6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| out-of-stack request (asserting the plain-language decline *and* the suggested-issue payload lands | ||
| on the owning repo), an unmapped need (asserting the catch-all default-intake redirect), and a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Under the pinned Stack map contract, a need that matches a row's Good for purpose is treated as in-stack, while anything that cannot confidently match falls through to the default-intake repo. That leaves this E2E scenario with no deterministic way to make an out-of-stack request land on a row's owning repo rather than the catch-all, so child 4 will either test behavior the skill contract does not permit or reintroduce ad-hoc routing outside the ADR.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Why
#49 wants a non-technical vibe coder to build apps on the devantler-tech stack from conversation alone — an epic-shaped feature whose load-bearing design decisions (what the plugin is, where its skills live, where the stack boundary is defined, how it talks) need settling before any bundling work, so the plugin doesn't blur into the marketplace's three existing engineering-facing audiences.
What
Adds ADR-0003 (documentation-only, no manifest/CI change): a new
plugins/vibe-codingagents+skills bundle as a distinct fourth audience; a three-skill family (needs→stack mapping, allowed-stack guardrail, jargon-free voice) with its canonical home in agent-skills (#56 twin); the allowed stack as a consumer-supplied Stack map contract section per ADR-0002's role-vs-configuration split (fail-closed decline + suggested issue for out-of-stack needs); and the plain-language voice contract. Follow-up children (skills, assembly, consume/E2E) are filed once accepted.Fixes #57. Part of #49.
Validated:
scripts/validate-manifests.shgreen (42 checks, 0 failures).