Skip to content

chore: sync main into develop (23 Sep) - #7052

Merged
Shivam-nagar23 merged 27 commits into
developfrom
chore/main-sync-2026-09-23
Sep 23, 2026
Merged

Shivam-nagar23 merged 27 commits into
developfrom
chore/main-sync-2026-09-23

Conversation

@Shivam-nagar23

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Routine sync of main into develop.

develop was 27 commits behind main and 0 commits ahead, so this is a clean fast-forward — no conflicts, no manual resolution.

Notable changes being brought in

Testing

No code changes authored here — content is identical to main, which is already released/verified.

Paired with the enterprise sync PR devtron-labs/devtron-enterprise#3423.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

claude and others added 27 commits September 1, 2026 11:18
GetAllApiTokensForWebhook checked whether each STORED api token had
trigger permission on the requested project/env, but never checked
whether the CALLING user was permitted to query that project/env at
all. As a result any authenticated user could request an arbitrary
projectName/environmentName/appName and receive the plaintext token
values of every stored api token (including super-admin tokens, whose
Casbin policy is "*" and therefore always passes the per-token check).

Add the same enforcement pattern used by the sibling handlers in this
file, but scoped to the resource being queried: verify the requesting
user's own token has trigger permission on the requested project and
every requested environment before the service call is made, so no
token data is looked up or returned for a project/env the caller
cannot access.

Fixes #7013
Inline the unnecessary "ok" variable in the caller-RBAC check added in
the previous commit, per SonarCloud's "remove this unnecessary variable
declaration and use the expression directly" finding on PR #7016.
…allers

Checking that a caller has trigger permission on the requested
project/env was not sufficient: a super-admin api-token's Casbin policy
is "*", so it always satisfies that same per-object check regardless of
how narrow the actual project/env being queried is. That meant any
caller with legitimate, narrow trigger access to some app/env could
still have super-admin (or other more-privileged) tokens returned
alongside their own in the same response.

Add callerDominatesToken, which excludes a stored token from the
response whenever it is a super-admin token and the caller is not,
reusing the same super-admin check already used by the other handlers
in this file. The per-object check now runs against each stored token
before this dominance check, matching the existing per-token-per-object
evaluation the service already performs.

The Enforcer interface here only exposes single-tuple Enforce/
EnforceInBatch calls, not policy or role enumeration, so a fully
generic "is token's permission a strict subset of the caller's"
comparison across every possible object isn't available without
extending that interface. Super-admin dominance is the well-defined,
checkable case that matches this issue (leaking admin token values),
so it's what this fix targets; a more general scope comparison would
need broader RBAC changes outside this endpoint's blast radius.
Group consecutive same-type parameters (storedToken/projObj/envObj and
callerToken/storedToken) per SonarCloud's finding on the code added in
the previous two commits.
Per thread decision: GetAllApiTokensForWebhook's only real caller is
the dashboard's webhook config modal, which is already super-admin-only
in the UI. Rather than layering a per-project/env caller check plus a
token-dominance check on top of the existing per-stored-token filter,
just gate the whole endpoint on the caller being a super-admin - the
same Enforce(token, ResourceGlobal, ActionUpdate, "*") check already
used by every other handler in this file (GetAllApiTokens,
CreateApiToken, UpdateApiToken, DeleteApiToken).

This removes the per-object caller check and the callerDominatesToken
logic added in the previous two commits; the existing per-stored-token
CheckAuthorizationForWebhook callback into the service is left as-is
since it still does useful filtering (only tokens with trigger
permission on the requested project/env are returned), it's just no
longer load-bearing for access control now that the endpoint itself
requires a super-admin caller.

Net effect vs main: an 8-line super-admin check added right after
GetLoggedInUser, matching the pattern already used by every sibling
handler in this file.
Inline the unnecessary "ok" variable in the super-admin check added to
GetAllApiTokensForWebhook, per SonarCloud's "remove this unnecessary
variable declaration" finding on PR #7016.
…-7013

fix(security): enforce caller RBAC in API token webhook endpoint
… performance

- Introduce `createApp`/`deleteApp` actions to segregate application lifecycle control from pipeline/workflow/config operations.
- Update RBAC enforcement to reflect the new `createApp`/`deleteApp` actions for better granularity.
- Add `idx_ci_artifact`, `idx_ci_workflow`, and other indexes to improve CI query execution and resolve PG_READ_TIMEOUT issues.
- Introduce GIN index for `git_triggers` to optimize material/commit lookup in `validateBuildSequence`.
DELETE /orchestrator/user/bulk with a listingRequest filter (instead of
explicit ids) resolved the delete target list via the same query
builder the listing endpoint uses, but skipped the normalization the
listing endpoint applies first (SetDefaultValuesIfNotPresent,
setStatusFilterType). With no default page size and no status
filtering applied, a filter such as {"searchKey":"","status":["inactive"]}
resolved to every active user instead of the intended filtered subset,
causing a bulk delete of far more users than intended.

getUserIdsHonoringFilters now applies the same normalization the
listing path (GetAllWithFilters) applies before building the query,
and rejects a filter-based bulk delete that carries no concrete filter
criteria instead of letting it silently resolve to "every user". The
explicit ids-based delete path is unchanged.

Fixes #7020

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J5DesTG5XvPdmPCDuL6izq
feat: decouple app lifecycle actions; add indexes to improve CI query…
fix: scope filter-based bulk user delete to match listing filters
When an external helm app is linked to the chart store, app_name holds the
unique identifier (<releaseName>-<namespace>-<clusterId>) while display_name
holds the release name. RBAC policies are always created against the release
name, since that is what the listing APIs expose to the user.

EnforcerUtil did not account for this:

- GetHelmObjectByAppNameAndEnvId looked the app up by app_name only, so a
  release-name lookup returned ErrNoRows and the object collapsed to "//",
  making the app invisible to any non super-admin user.
- Both it and GetHelmObject built the object from application.AppName, i.e.
  the unique identifier, which never matched the granted policy.
- Neither substituted the "unassigned" project when team_id is 0, so an app
  linked without a project produced an empty project segment.

EnforcerUtilHelm.GetAppRBACNameByInstalledAppId and
GetAppRBACNameByInstalledAppIdAndTeamId had the same raw AppName problem.

Resolve the app the same way getAppObject already does: reconstruct the unique
identifier from the environment and try that first, falling back to the plain
name for regular chart store apps, legacy rows and callers that already pass
the identifier. Emit the display name via the new App.GetAppNameForRbac(), and
fall back to the unassigned project when no project is assigned.

Fixing the primitives covers all downstream call sites without touching the
handlers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…re intentionally not sent for the plugin's internal steps.
feat: resolve RBAC inconsistencies for helm apps with unique identifiers
…-pipeline-level-oss

misc: Conditions saved with the plugin definition (plugin_step_condition) a…
* chore: create a makefile to setup and clean resources for development

* feat: add flag for frontend to show argo/flux tabs

- add migration files
- append flags in the /orchestrator/user/check/roles API to show/hide argo/flux tabs

* feat: changes for dropdown API in user permissions page

* fix: missing dependencies in constructor method

* fix: improper filtering logic

- earlier filter was only applied with the cluster ID
- add changes to filter based on cluster ID's and namespaces

* fix: prevent connecting to kubelink for failed clusters

* wip: policy enforcements

* wip: policy enforcements

* chore: remove test folder

* fix: code review fixes

* fix: code review fixes

* fix: code review fixes

* chore: rename migration scripts to maintain sync with enterprise

* chore: change migration script number

* fix: roles missing while fetching user roles

* fix: deleted roles being listed

* fix: deleted roles being listed

* fix: review fixes
Points common-lib and authenticator at devtron-services main
(f0b3fba15081b8d40a795928aaad5df55473c681, the v0.47.0 RC merge).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
chore: update devtron-services deps to main for v0.47.0
…bac idempotent

Two different migrations shared version 36504600 on the release branch:
add_ci_workflow_active_status_index and dev_admin_app_lifecycle. The
latter is already released on main at that number, so the CI index
migration (RC-only) is renumbered to 36904600, the next free slot.

Also adds ON CONFLICT ("entity","access_type","role") DO NOTHING to both
INSERTs in 36804600_argo_flux_rbac.up.sql. Both rbac_policy_data and
rbac_role_data declare UNIQUE (entity, access_type, role), so a re-run
previously failed on the unique constraint instead of being a no-op.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
….47.0

chore: sync main into release-candidate-v0.47.0
…nation

The Devtron Apps list dropped the entire AppStatuses filter whenever
HIBERNATING was among the selected statuses, ran LIMIT/OFFSET and
count(distinct a.id) over the *unfiltered* app set, and only then re-applied
the status filter in memory -- to the single page that came back -- while
overwriting the total count with the size of that surviving slice.

So the filter returned just the hibernating apps that happened to land on the
requested page of the unfiltered listing, and reported that handful as the
grand total, leaving the UI with no further pages. Verified against a customer
database: 592 hibernating apps exist, 2 were shown.

HIBERNATING is an ordinary value persisted in app_status.status
(appStatus.UpdateStatusWithAppIdEnvId normalises Suspended/Hibernated to it),
and the in-memory pass compared against that very same column -- so the
predicate was always expressible in SQL. buildAppListingWhereCondition already
emits `aps.status IN (?)` for any status list, including the NOT DEPLOYED
combination, so the workaround is simply removed rather than replaced.

This also fixes combination filters that were collateral damage: selecting
Healthy + Hibernating blanked both predicates, and Hibernating + Not Deployed
additionally killed the NOT DEPLOYED SQL branch.

The workaround was originally added for Helm-type pipelines, whose status is
not persisted in app_status. That cohort is unaffected either way -- the
in-memory pass read the same empty column -- and is now documented as a TODO
in place of the removed code.

Pager: devtron-labs/sprint-tasks#2974

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ination-2974

fix: Hibernating filter in Devtron Apps list shows incomplete results (pager #2974)
@bito-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Branch Excluded

Bito didn't auto-review because the source or target branch is excluded from automatic reviews. To trigger review, type /review in the comment and save. You can change the settings here, or contact the agent instance creator at shivam@devtron.ai.

@Shivam-nagar23
Shivam-nagar23 merged commit b3c7d3b into develop Sep 23, 2026
14 of 16 checks passed
@Shivam-nagar23
Shivam-nagar23 deleted the chore/main-sync-2026-09-23 branch September 23, 2026 07:30
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants