Skip to content

Remove outdated labels from breaking change issue template#54637

Open
svick wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
svick-patch-1
Open

Remove outdated labels from breaking change issue template#54637
svick wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
svick-patch-1

Conversation

@svick

@svick svick commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removed 'Pri1' and 'doc-idea' labels from breaking change issue template. These labels don't seem to exist anymore.

(Note that this doesn't seem to be a problem when the issue template is used directly on GitHub, but it confused copilot.)


Internal previews

📄 File 🔗 Preview link
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/02-breaking-change.yml .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/02-breaking-change

Removed 'Pri1' and 'doc-idea' labels from breaking change issue template. These labels don't seem to exist anymore.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 3, 2026 15:04
@svick svick requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2026 15:04
@dotnetrepoman dotnetrepoman Bot added this to the July 2026 milestone Jul 3, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the GitHub “.NET breaking change” issue template to stop auto-applying labels that appear to be deprecated, keeping issue triage metadata aligned with the current label set.

Changes:

  • Removed the Pri1 label from the breaking change issue template.
  • Removed the doc-idea label from the breaking change issue template.

@gewarren gewarren left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @svick

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants