Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
docs: sync coverage figures to the generated report (351/443) #311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: sync coverage figures to the generated report (351/443) #311
Changes from all commits
69be752cb274f4File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Use dossier coverage terminology.
Line 26-27 calls 351/443 the battery size. The plan distinguishes 338 battery tests from 351 dossier assertions. State that the dossier coverage is 351/443 to prevent readers from treating 351 as the test count.
Proposed wording
Based on learnings: battery test count and dossier assertion coverage are intentionally non-equivalent.
As per path instructions: Docs are the spec, not a history log.
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Sources: Path instructions, Learnings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
Align all ares claims with the executable validation path.
The supplied
scripts/accuracysnes/crossval.shexplicitly excludes ares and states that no headless or memory-dump path exists. The changed documentation and changelog therefore report results that the shown validation path cannot produce. Update the host, driver, and citations together. If the ares claims remain, use “three reference emulators” unless the provenance rule supports “independent.”docs/STATUS.md#L219-L225: add the ares host to the executable validation path, or remove the headless-host and defect claims.docs/STATUS.md#L244-L244: remove ares from the cross-validation list until the runner produces the result, and replace “independent references” unless justified by the provenance model.docs/accuracysnes-plan.md#L20-L24: do not citescripts/accuracysnes/crossval.shfor ares divergences until the script runs ares.docs/accuracysnes-plan.md#L746-L751: reportares: OK (4 known)and all-host scene results only after the repository contains that runnable validation path.CHANGELOG.md#L18-L21: document ares as a reference only when the corresponding host and driver are shipped.As per path instructions: Docs are the spec, not a history log.
📍 Affects 3 files
docs/STATUS.md#L219-L225(this comment)docs/STATUS.md#L244-L244docs/accuracysnes-plan.md#L20-L24docs/accuracysnes-plan.md#L746-L751CHANGELOG.md#L18-L21🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Source: Path instructions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.