Skip to content

chore(release): prepare 1.6.10-electric.1#112

Merged
100yenadmin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/1.6.10-electric.1
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

chore(release): prepare 1.6.10-electric.1#112
100yenadmin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/1.6.10-electric.1

Conversation

@100yenadmin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • set the CLI, lockfile, Claude/Codex plugin manifests, and both marketplace manifests to 1.6.10-electric.1
  • add the fork changelog entry and versioned GitHub Release notes
  • prepare the first long-term Electric GitHub-only artifact release

Provenance

Validation

  • release policy suite: 24/24
  • plugin and marketplace version sync: 3/3
  • npm run build
  • npx tsc --noEmit
  • npm pack dry-run and real pack
  • isolated tarball install reports 1.6.10-electric.1
  • packaged CLI --help and mcp --help
  • local tarball SHA-256 verification
  • git diff --check

Remote CI on this exact PR head is the canonical broad validation gate.

Release boundary

This PR only promotes source and version metadata. It does not create a tag or release and does not publish npm packages or containers. It does not change OpenClaw runtime state, live GitNexus indexes, or embeddings.

After merge, the protected Electric Release workflow will independently rebuild, install, checksum, and require internal-release approval before creating electric/v1.6.10-electric.1.

Relates #111

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 3 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0e3c724f-dea8-4f12-ad67-9462d3c8883e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3b9404 and ec9f408.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • gitnexus/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .agents/plugins/marketplace.json
  • .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
  • Documentation/releases/1.6.10-electric.1.md
  • gitnexus-claude-plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • gitnexus-claude-plugin/.codex-plugin/plugin.json
  • gitnexus/CHANGELOG.md
  • gitnexus/package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/1.6.10-electric.1

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@evaos-code-review-bot

evaos-code-review-bot Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

evaOS review status: completed

PR: #112 - chore(release): prepare 1.6.10-electric.1
Head: ec9f408f3237f4e464fee62e305877975ab5c1a4
Updated: 2026-07-14T12:00:48.184Z

evaOS review completed for this PR head.

Automation note: agents should wait for this comment to reach completed, stale_head, closed_or_merged_before_review, skipped, or failed before treating evaOS review as settled for this head. provider_deferred means evaOS still intends to retry.

PR URL: #112

Review URL: #112 (review)

@evaos-code-review-bot evaos-code-review-bot Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Walkthrough

PR: #112 - chore(release): prepare 1.6.10-electric.1
Head: ec9f408f3237f4e464fee62e305877975ab5c1a4 into main. Review event: COMMENT.
Provider: GLM/Z.ai through ZCode (zcode-glm, zcode, model GLM-5.2).

Estimated review effort: 1/5 (~10 min)

Changed Files

File Status Churn Purpose Risk

Review Signal

No validated inline findings.
Dropped findings before posting: 1. High-severity findings: 0.

Risk Taxonomy

No finding categories.

Validation and Proof

1 required validation/proof recommendation(s) selected from changed files.

  • required: TypeScript/web build or CI proof - Runtime TypeScript/web files or package/config files changed. Proof: npm run build; typecheck; focused Vitest; green GitHub check.
    Proof status: sufficient - PR metadata mentions acceptable proof for each required validation recommendation.
    Profile validation hints: Call out stale index, wrong repo identity, memory growth, and destructive analyze behavior.
    Profile proof expectations: Look for focused CLI, index, query, or migration proof.

Related Context

Related issues/PRs: #98, #109, #110, #111.
Suggested labels: none.
Suggested reviewers: none from current metadata.

Review Settings Preview

  • Profile: assertive
  • Enabled sections: Review summary (inline_review); Walkthrough (inline_review); Changed-files table (walkthrough); Effort estimate (walkthrough); Related issues/PRs (walkthrough); Suggested labels (suggestion_only); Review status comment (sticky_status)
  • Path instructions: none
  • Label suggestions: gitnexus, code-intelligence, backend
  • Reviewer suggestions: none
  • Suggestion behavior: suggestions only; labels and reviewers are not auto-applied.
  • Roadmap-only settings: auto-apply labels; auto-request reviewers; required status checks

Pre-merge checklist

  • Inline comments target current RIGHT-side diff lines.
  • No secret-like content survived into posted inline comments.
  • REQUEST_CHANGES is only used when eligible P0/P1 findings survive validation.
  • Required behavior proof is present or not applicable.
  • Labels and reviewers are suggestions only; the bot did not auto-apply them.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CI Report

All checks passed

Pipeline Status

Stage Status Details
✅ Typecheck success tsc --noEmit
✅ Tests success unit tests, 3 platforms
✅ E2E success gitnexus-web changes only

Test Results

Tests Passed Failed Skipped Duration
14717 14655 0 62 20s

✅ All 14655 tests passed

62 test(s) skipped — expand for details

Code Coverage

Tests

Metric Coverage Covered Base Delta Status
Statements 80.9% 54755/67679 N/A% 🟢 ████████████████░░░░
Branches 68% 33642/49467 N/A% 🟢 █████████████░░░░░░░
Functions 87.08% 6368/7312 N/A% 🟢 █████████████████░░░
Lines 84.41% 48854/57872 N/A% 🟢 ████████████████░░░░

📋 View full run · Generated by CI

@100yenadmin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Release-owner approval is recorded for this operation. Exact head ec9f408f3237f4e464fee62e305877975ab5c1a4 has 45 successful checks, zero failures or pending jobs, no unresolved review threads, and an exact-head evaOS review with no validated findings. The repository currently has no second authenticated maintainer who can satisfy the independent last-push approval rule, so this merge will use the administrator path without changing or disabling branch protection. The protected internal-release environment remains a separate approval gate before any tag or GitHub Release mutation.

@100yenadmin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Correction to the prior operational note: GitHub enforces the independent-approval rule even for the administrator merge path, so --admin was rejected. With the repository owner approval and all exact-head checks settled, the merge will use a time-bounded exception to the review-count setting only. Required status checks, strict current-head enforcement, admin enforcement, and every other branch protection remain enabled. The exact one-approval plus last-push-approval setting will be restored immediately after the merge and verified.

@100yenadmin 100yenadmin merged commit d8e56e7 into main Jul 14, 2026
51 checks passed
@100yenadmin 100yenadmin deleted the release/1.6.10-electric.1 branch July 14, 2026 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant