feat(analyze): add preservation-only recovery contract#72
Open
100yenadmin wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
100yenadmin
force-pushed
the
reconcile/r10-preservation-contract
branch
from
a330b38 to
a92ee70
Compare
100yenadmin
force-pushed
the
reconcile/r09-fts-disposition
branch
from
99a7107 to
342abaa
Compare
evaOS review status: completedPR: #72 - feat(analyze): add preservation-only recovery contract evaOS review completed for this PR head. Automation note: agents should wait for this comment to reach PR URL: #72 Review URL: #72 (review) |
CI Report✅ All checks passed Pipeline Status
Test Results
✅ All 14488 tests passed 62 test(s) skipped — expand for details
Code CoverageTests
📋 View full run · Generated by CI |
![evaos-code-review-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/4184532?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Walkthrough
PR: #72 - feat(analyze): add preservation-only recovery contract
Head: a92ee70486887e808b73d821eeb0bddab62b8781 into reconcile/r09-fts-disposition. Review event: COMMENT.
Provider: GLM/Z.ai through ZCode (zcode-glm, zcode, model GLM-5.2).
Estimated review effort: 1/5 (~10 min)
Changed Files
| File | Status | Churn | Purpose | Risk |
|---|
Review Signal
No validated inline findings.
Dropped findings before posting: 3. High-severity findings: 0.
Risk Taxonomy
No finding categories.
Validation and Proof
1 required validation/proof recommendation(s) selected from changed files.
- required: TypeScript/web build or CI proof - Runtime TypeScript/web files or package/config files changed. Proof: npm run build; typecheck; focused Vitest; green GitHub check.
Proof status: sufficient - PR metadata mentions acceptable proof for each required validation recommendation.
Profile validation hints: Call out stale index, wrong repo identity, memory growth, and destructive analyze behavior.
Profile proof expectations: Look for focused CLI, index, query, or migration proof.
Related Context
Related issues/PRs: #49.
Suggested labels: none.
Suggested reviewers: none from current metadata.
Review Settings Preview
- Profile: assertive
- Enabled sections: Review summary (inline_review); Walkthrough (inline_review); Changed-files table (walkthrough); Effort estimate (walkthrough); Related issues/PRs (walkthrough); Suggested labels (suggestion_only); Review status comment (sticky_status)
- Path instructions: none
- Label suggestions: gitnexus, code-intelligence, backend
- Reviewer suggestions: none
- Suggestion behavior: suggestions only; labels and reviewers are not auto-applied.
- Roadmap-only settings: auto-apply labels; auto-request reviewers; required status checks
Pre-merge checklist
- Inline comments target current RIGHT-side diff lines.
- No secret-like content survived into posted inline comments.
- REQUEST_CHANGES is only used when eligible P0/P1 findings survive validation.
- Required behavior proof is present or not applicable.
- Labels and reviewers are suggestions only; the bot did not auto-apply them.
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
Open
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracks #49.
Contract
analyze --incremental-onlyas a strict refusal contract for recovery, migration, incompatible schema/mode changes, missing baselines, and full-rebuild escalation.doctor [path] --recovery-plandiagnostics for graph, WAL, FTS, metadata, and embeddings.Evidence
Full retained evidence:
/Volumes/LEXAR/Codex/session-notes/2026-07-13/gitnexus-fork-upstream-reconciliation/r10-interrupted-analysis-preservation.md.Boundaries