Implementation of Indexes and Compacting

[pathsny]

Hi
I've made some changes to node-dirty (for my own purpose mainly). But Im hoping you can pull it in so it changes what npm provides :)

[felixge]

Looks very interesting. Any reason you didn't add a callback to 'compact'? This would remove the need for the two additional events.

[pathsny]

Hmm not really. I was just trying to figure out the node way. In this case
do I think a callback is better. I used events to prevent nesting, nothing
more.

Btw I had introduced a subtle bug. I've fixed it in the commit after the
pull request I think.

On 22 Apr 2011 18:38, "felixge" <
reply@reply.github.com>
wrote:

Looks very interesting. Any reason you didn't add a callback to 'compact'?
This would remove the need for the two additional events.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)

[felixge]

How are events preventing nesting?

[pathsny]

Hi felix,
I just meant that calls to compact need not include a function (which
would typically be nested). But this would typically be solvable using a
named function.

The truth is, until I try to build.something that is gonna act on the
information of whether the compact failed or suceeded, I'm not sure which
api is easier to consume. I ended up consuming the events internally, so I
let them remain something available externally too.

This could have just as well been done by passing a callback around though,
both inside node dirty and outside.

On 23 Apr 2011 16:03, "felixge" <
reply@reply.github.com>
wrote:

How are events preventing nesting?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)