Skip to content

ci: fix storage emulator integration tests on Node 24#10641

Open
joehan wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
jh-fix-storage-emulator-node-24
Open

ci: fix storage emulator integration tests on Node 24#10641
joehan wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
jh-fix-storage-emulator-node-24

Conversation

@joehan

@joehan joehan commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

The storage emulator test was broken on Node 24 due to a puppeteer incompatibility. We'll need to update our version of puppeteer eventually to address this, but for now, we can just stick this on node 22

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

### Description
Node 20 is being deprecated from GitHub Actions. As part of upgrading our workflow:
- The integration and integration-windows jobs have been updated to run on Node 22 (Active LTS).
- This prevents a compatibility crash between the repository's Puppeteer v19 dependency and Node 24 (which clobbers file descriptors during child process spawning, causing Chrome to fail to launch with 'Invalid file descriptor to ICU data received').
- Other non-browser, single-version jobs remain on Node 24.
- Multi-version jobs continue to cover Node 22 and 24.

### Scenarios Tested
- Verified all GHA workflows, compilation, unit tests, and storage emulator integration tests pass successfully on GHA Node 22.

### Sample Commands
None
@joehan joehan force-pushed the jh-fix-storage-emulator-node-24 branch from c2e817d to 5969b34 Compare June 17, 2026 17:32
joehan added 3 commits June 17, 2026 10:43
…ll other integration tests

This meets the GHA Node 20 deprecation rules by keeping all integration and windows-integration tests on Node 24, except the storage-emulator-integration test which runs on Node 22 (LTS) to avoid Puppeteer v19 compatibility crashes with Node 24.
@joehan joehan requested a review from shettyvarun268 June 17, 2026 21:17

@shettyvarun268 shettyvarun268 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants