Ch3 editorial fixes: structure, replication packages ref, Soto claim (#16)#37
Open
LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Ch3 editorial fixes: structure, replication packages ref, Soto claim (#16)#37LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
LukasWallrich wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
- Move the generalizability/boundary-conditions paragraph out of Uncertainty into the Value section, where it reads as a motivation for replication (R1). - Promote the 'Theoretical contribution' and 'Availability of reproductions and replications' pseudo-headings to proper ### subsections under Uncertainty, matching the book's heading style (R2). - Add a forward reference from the replication-package mention in Feasibility to the Gathering resources section opening the Execution of Reproductions chapter (R2). - Soto citation already removed in an earlier commit, so no change was needed (the current text no longer presents any field as highly replicable).
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses #16 (R1/R2/internal). Editorial moves on existing content in
choosing_study.qmdonly.***Theoretical contribution***and***Availability of reproductions and replications***bold-italic pseudo-headings to proper###subsections under Uncertainty. This matches the book's heading style (other chapters already use###) and makes the intended enumeration clear.execution_reproductions.qmd#gathering-resources) rather than@sec-, because that chapter has no{#sec-}label and the scope did not permit editing it.[though not all, e.g., @Soto2019]clause was already removed in commit 60e9e79; current text (line 171) reads only "low replicability rate in many fields" and presents no field as highly replicable, so there is no claim left to qualify and re-adding the citation would have introduced a new citation (out of scope).Render verified: "Output created", no
[?]/??broken cross-refs or citations, and the forward-reference link resolves to the existing#gathering-resourcesanchor in the Execution of Reproductions chapter.Out of scope (other issues): §4.1 (Post-Publication Conversations) move, §3.4 (Researcher Bias) reconsideration.