Update skills#701
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 1 Skipped Deployment
|
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR establishes a comprehensive system of agent skills for GitHub workflows and repository standards. It adds eight skill definitions (creating/reviewing/updating issues and PRs, implementing features, managing Git operations, and defining a FreePascal toolchain), each with stricter workflow enforcement via "non-negotiable gates." The skills are registered in skills-lock.json and interconnected through a unified dependency flow. ChangesAgent Skills System & Workflow Standards
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Comment |
coderabbitai
Bot
added
documentation
Contributor
Suite TimingTest Runner (interpreted: 9,880 passed; bytecode: 9,880 passed)
MemoryGC rows aggregate the main thread plus all worker thread-local GCs. Test runner worker shutdown frees thread-local heaps in bulk; that shutdown reclamation is not counted as GC collections or collected objects.
Benchmarks (interpreted: 407; bytecode: 407)
MemoryGC rows aggregate the main thread plus all worker thread-local GCs. Benchmark runner performs explicit between-file collections, so collection and collected-object counts can be much higher than the test runner.
Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. |
Contributor
Benchmark Results407 benchmarks Interpreted: 🟢 13 improved · 🔴 392 regressed · 2 unchanged · avg -25.5% arraybuffer.js — Interp: 🔴 14 · avg -27.3% · Bytecode: 🔴 6, 8 unch. · avg -3.5%
arrays.js — Interp: 🔴 19 · avg -27.4% · Bytecode: 🟢 9, 🔴 1, 9 unch. · avg +4.5%
async-await.js — Interp: 🔴 6 · avg -27.1% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 5 unch. · avg +2.6%
async-generators.js — Interp: 🔴 2 · avg -29.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 1 unch. · avg +2.2%
base64.js — Interp: 🔴 10 · avg -21.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 9 unch. · avg +0.5%
classes.js — Interp: 🔴 30, 1 unch. · avg -23.5% · Bytecode: 🟢 10, 21 unch. · avg +3.7%
closures.js — Interp: 🔴 11 · avg -27.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 3, 🔴 3, 5 unch. · avg -0.2%
collections.js — Interp: 🔴 12 · avg -29.7% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 10 unch. · avg +1.2%
csv.js — Interp: 🔴 13 · avg -28.5% · Bytecode: 13 unch. · avg -1.3%
destructuring.js — Interp: 🔴 22 · avg -26.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 20 unch. · avg +0.9%
fibonacci.js — Interp: 🔴 8 · avg -29.4% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 6 unch. · avg +1.5%
float16array.js — Interp: 🔴 32 · avg -27.0% · Bytecode: 🟢 12, 20 unch. · avg +8.9%
for-of.js — Interp: 🔴 7 · avg -22.7% · Bytecode: 7 unch. · avg +0.7%
generators.js — Interp: 🔴 4 · avg -26.4% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 3 unch. · avg +2.4%
iterators.js — Interp: 🔴 42 · avg -29.6% · Bytecode: 🟢 3, 🔴 16, 23 unch. · avg -2.4%
json.js — Interp: 🔴 20 · avg -29.1% · Bytecode: 🟢 10, 10 unch. · avg +3.6%
jsx.jsx — Interp: 🔴 21 · avg -20.5% · Bytecode: 🟢 18, 3 unch. · avg +7.4%
modules.js — Interp: 🔴 9 · avg -26.0% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 3, 5 unch. · avg -1.9%
numbers.js — Interp: 🔴 11 · avg -28.6% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 3, 7 unch. · avg -1.4%
objects.js — Interp: 🔴 7 · avg -24.5% · Bytecode: 🟢 5, 2 unch. · avg +8.2%
promises.js — Interp: 🔴 12 · avg -16.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 10 unch. · avg +3.0%
regexp.js — Interp: 🔴 11 · avg -21.3% · Bytecode: 🟢 4, 🔴 1, 6 unch. · avg +2.0%
strings.js — Interp: 🔴 19 · avg -25.8% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 🔴 3, 14 unch. · avg +0.1%
tsv.js — Interp: 🔴 9 · avg -21.7% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 8 unch. · avg +1.3%
typed-arrays.js — Interp: 🔴 22 · avg -30.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 4, 🔴 6, 12 unch. · avg -6.3%
uint8array-encoding.js — Interp: 🟢 13, 🔴 4, 1 unch. · avg +5.5% · Bytecode: 🟢 12, 6 unch. · avg +17.8%
weak-collections.js — Interp: 🔴 15 · avg -44.3% · Bytecode: 🟢 7, 🔴 3, 5 unch. · avg -1.6%
Deterministic profile diffDeterministic profile diff: no significant changes. Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. Benchmark ranges compare cached main-branch min/max ops/sec with the PR run; overlapping ranges are treated as unchanged noise. Percentage deltas are secondary context. |
Contributor
test262 Conformance
Areas closest to 100%
Per-test deltas (+1 / -0)Newly passing (1):
Steady-state failures are non-blocking; regressions vs the cached main baseline (lower total pass count, or any PASS → non-PASS transition) fail the conformance gate. Measured on ubuntu-latest x64, bytecode mode. Areas grouped by the first two test262 path components; minimum 25 attempted tests, areas already at 100% excluded. Δ vs main compares against the most recent cached |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update project skills