🧹 L-DOI-HONEST: honest DOI/Coq provenance (R5)#739
Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
…lore
Audit 2026-05-12 (queen + grandmaster cross-check) revealed two overclaims:
1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 was repeatedly cited as 'paper anchor' /
'Trinity Identity record'. Zenodo metadata confirms the real scope:
'Trinity B007: VSA Operations for Ternary Computing v5.0' — a software
deposit containing a 1968-byte description file (1 download, 49 views).
It is a persistent identifier, not a peer-reviewed paper.
2. The phrase '84 theorems in t27' was folklore. Actual count in
gHashTag/t27/coq (audit 2026-05-12): 48 Coq statements (6 Theorem +
42 Lemma), 35 Qed-proven, 0 Admitted, in 10 .v files.
This patch makes the documentation honest without changing the underlying
mathematics or breaking the ACM AE 'Available' badge witness:
- artifact/CLAIMS.md — annotate DOI 19227877 as 'B007 VSA description
stub', add parent 19227879 row, add Coq witness row pointing to
gHashTag/t27/coq with verified counts.
- artifact/INSTALL.md — same annotation on the persistent record line.
- .trinity/skills/trainer-igla-sot/SKILL.md — frontmatter + body switch
from 'Zenodo DOI is the anchor' to 'Coq witness is the anchor, Zenodo
is provenance'.
- .trinity/skills/tailscale-trinity-mesh/SKILL.md — annotate ssot_doi.
- .trinity/skills/README.md — full honest provenance footer.
The acm-ae-check witness substrings ('phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3' and
'10.5281/zenodo.19227877') remain present, so exit code 72 is preserved.
R5-honest. ICA-DOI-2026-05-12-T22:00. Throne trios#264.
This was referenced May 12, 2026
Merged
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2026
…st) (#744) * fix(phd): remove '84 theorems' and 'anchor paper' overclaims (R5-honest) Phase 3 of L-DOI-HONEST sweep (after PR #739 + #740). After Zenodo metadata rehab (NASA report ZENODO-REHAB-2026-05-12-T22:45), canonical records 19227877 / 19227879 are R5-honest software description stubs. PhD monograph still carried legacy 'Trinity anchor paper' / '84 theorems' phrasings that contradict the audited reality. Fixes: - docs/phd/appendix/G-data-availability.tex: AVL-1 and AVL-3 descriptions now say 'software description stub'; AVL-1 links to gHashTag/t27/coq with audited counts (48 statements, 35 Proven, 0 Admitted on 2026-05-12) - docs/phd/bibliography.bib: two @misc entries for DOI 19227877 rewritten to drop 'paper' / '84 theorems' wording; note fields explicitly state 'software description stub, not a peer-reviewed paper' and link Coq witness with audited counts - docs/phd/frontmatter/list-of-theorems.tex: TODO-3 no longer hard-codes '≥84 theorems' target; uses audit-driven count instead - docs/phd/reproducibility.md: 'Trinity paper anchor' row renamed; added explicit Coq witness row with audit counts - docs/phd/theorems/igla/README.md: references row points to audited counts in gHashTag/t27/coq Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3 (algebraic identity). DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 is a software description stub of Trinity B007. No theorem counts are claimed in title / abstract metadata anymore (see ZENODO-REHAB report). * fix(R5-pass-2): replace all '84/297/376 theorems' overclaims with audited counts PASS-2 of L-DOI-HONEST after the 2026-05-12 community-attach audit found 8 more files in trios that contained R5 violations the Phase-3 PR #744 did not cover, plus the Phase-3 counts themselves (48 statements / 35 Proven) turned out to be a SUBSET (only docs/phd/theorems/Kernel/* + /Theorems/*), not the full gHashTag/t27 Coq corpus. Source of truth on 2026-05-12 — gHashTag/t27 (clone, audit cmd: `find ./coq ./proofs -name '*.v' -print0 | xargs -0 grep -hcE '...'`): 28 .v files (10 under coq/, 18 under proofs/) 218 statements (122 Theorem + 96 Lemma) 162 Qed | 32 Admitted | 11 Abort NO proofs/canonical/ directory NO _Manifest.json Earlier framings retired in this commit: - "84 Coq theorems" (4 files) - "84 + 5 = 89 (F_11 Fibonacci prime)" (1 file) - "376 Theorems for the IGLA Invariants" / "312 Qed, 64 Admitted" (1 file) - "Trinity Anchor record (TRI-27 series)" (1 file) - "TRI-27 anchor DOI" (1 file) - "297 Qed canonical + SHA-1 manifest across 65 .v files" (1 file) - Phase-3 understated 48/35/0 counts (5 files) Fixes: - artifact/CLAIMS.md: "Trinity Anchor record (TRI-27 series)" -> "software description stub for Trinity B007 (NOT a peer-reviewed paper)" + audited Coq counts - docs/golden-sunflowers/app-b-golden-ledger-297-qed-canonical-sha-1.md: prepended [SUPERSEDED — 2026-05-12 R5-honest sweep] banner; document retained for provenance but explicitly marked unverified (the proofs/canonical/ directory and _Manifest.json it describes do not exist) - docs/phd/appendix/G-data-availability.tex: update audit row from 48/35/0 to 218/162/32/11 + 28 files - docs/phd/bibliography.bib: zenodo_trinity + coq_companion_zenodo notes now say "software description stub, NOT a peer-reviewed paper" and quote the audited 218/162/32 counts; the second entry retires the "376 Theorems" title in favour of "Audited Trinity Invariants (IGLA)" - docs/phd/frontmatter/list-of-theorems.tex: TODO comment now uses 218 statements / 162 Qed instead of 48/35 - docs/phd/reproducibility.md: row count updated to 218/162/32/11 - docs/phd/theorems/igla/README.md: same - docs/research/coq-invariants-strategy.md: TL;DR diagram + invariants section quote audited counts (218 t27-side, 340 trios-PhD-side) - tools/acm_ae_check/src/lib.rs: ZENODO_DOI const doc explicitly identifies the deposit as "Trinity B007 software description stub (NOT a paper)"; TRI-27 anchor phrasing dropped - trinity-clara/proofs/README.md: F_11=89 cosmetic framing retired; "Connection to Existing 84 Theorems" section now points to the audited Trinity Coq corpus with a footnote explaining the supersession Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3 (algebraic identity, falsifiable independently of any DOI). Audited Coq witness: https://github.com/gHashTag/t27/tree/main/coq + https://github.com/gHashTag/t27/tree/main/proofs (28 .v files, 218 statements, 162 Qed, 32 Admitted, 11 Abort, audit 2026-05-12) Co-authored-by: Trinity Queen Hive <queen-hive@trinity.local> * fix(R5-pass-3): retire all superseded D-series DOIs (19020211/13/15/17 -> 19020270/75/80/82) + bump zenodo-registry verified date to 2026-05-12 PASS-3 anomalies fixed in trios (17 files): - docs/golden-sunflowers/{app-a, app-f, ch-6, ch-8, ch-14, ch-21, ch-30}.md: 35+ D-series DOI replacements - docs/phd/chapters/{ch_06, ch_08, ch_14, ch_21, ch_30, fa_06, fa_08, fa_14, fa_30}.tex: same - docs/infrastructure/zenodo-registry.md: §4 D-series table canonical DOIs + Retired note + §7 D-series-mid-March row + footer updated; §1 rule 5 anchor reworded as software description stub All references now point to canonical 2026-05-12 D-series records. R5 verification: 0 hallucinated/superseded DOI references remain in trios. Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3 Issue: #264 --------- Co-authored-by: Trinity Queen Hive <queen-hive@trinity.local>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🧹 L-DOI-HONEST — Honest DOI/Coq provenance (R5)
Closes overclaim flagged in ICA-DOI-2026-05-12-T22:00. Sibling PR: gHashTag/trios-trainer-igla#fix/l-doi-honest.
Audit findings (R5-honest)
Cross-repo sweep on 2026-05-12 surfaced two propagated overclaims:
Overclaim #1 — "Trinity paper anchor: 10.5281/zenodo.19227877"
Zenodo metadata audit (REST API, 2026-05-12):
Trinity B007: VSA Operations for Ternary Computing v5.0B007_v5_description.md(1968 bytes — markdown abstract only)The DOI is a persistent identifier for a software description stub. Calling it a "paper anchor" or "Trinity Anchor record (TRI-27 series)" implies peer review that does not exist.
Overclaim #2 — "84 Coq theorems in t27"
Fresh shallow clone of
gHashTag/t27, audit 2026-05-12:48 ≠ 84. The "84 theorems" phrase is folklore. Zero hits for "84 theorem" anywhere in the gHashTag org as of 2026-05-12 — overclaim was only in skills/templates, never in code.
What this PR changes
artifact/CLAIMS.md19227877as "B007 VSA description stub, NOT a peer-reviewed paper". Add parent19227879and t27 Coq witness rows to the persistent-identifier table. ACM AE "Available" badge witness substrings (phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3and10.5281/zenodo.19227877) remain present →acm-ae-check runexit code 72 path is preserved byte-stable.artifact/INSTALL.md.trinity/skills/trainer-igla-sot/SKILL.mdzenodo_doi:→zenodo_provenance:+ addcoq_witness:. Description switched from "Zenodo DOI is the anchor" to "algebraic identity, Coq witness is the corpus, Zenodo is provenance"..trinity/skills/tailscale-trinity-mesh/SKILL.mdssot_doi..trinity/skills/README.mdFalsifiability gate (G1)
H:
acm-ae-check runreturns 0 against the patchedartifact/CLAIMS.mdAND no occurrence of the substring84 theorem,84-theorem, or84 Coqexists in the repo.Refuted iff:
acm-ae-check runexits non-zero, ORgrep -r '84 theorem\|84-theorem\|84 Coq' .returns a hit.Verified pre-push: 0 hits for the forbidden substrings; witness substrings present 3+4+1 times.
Citation grade (G4)
The algebraic anchor
phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3now traces to:gHashTag/t27/coq(48 statements, 35 Proven, 0 Admitted, audit 2026-05-12) +trinity-clara/proofs/igla/lucas_closure_gf16.v::lucas_2_eq_3(Proven).assertions/igla_assertions.json::numeric_anchor.phi.crates/trios-igla-race/src/invariants.rs::PHI.Constitutional compliance
.mdfiles changedmain, PR tomainCoordination
docs/DOI_PROVENANCE.mdtrinity-grandmaster,trinity-queen-hive,tri-gardener-runbook, plus implicit cascade throughnasa-mission-report).φ² + φ⁻² = 3 · TRINITY · R5-HONEST · NEVER STOP