Skip to content

feat(skills-next): add browser SDK references#237

Open
evanpurkhiser wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
evanpurkhiser/feat-skills-next-add-browser-sdk-references
Open

feat(skills-next): add browser SDK references#237
evanpurkhiser wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
evanpurkhiser/feat-skills-next-add-browser-sdk-references

Conversation

@evanpurkhiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Direct LLM port of the existing browser SDK skill into the skills-next per-SDK reference layout under skills-next/references/sdks/browser/. This content has NOT been reviewed at all — it is a machine-generated port of the existing SDK skill, and every file should be treated as unverified.

Comment thread skills-next/references/sdks/browser/index.md Outdated
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser force-pushed the evanpurkhiser/feat-skills-next-add-browser-sdk-references branch from cfe6f3c to 8268192 Compare July 2, 2026 21:14

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8268192. Configure here.

Comment thread skills-next/references/sdks/browser/session-replay.md
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser force-pushed the evanpurkhiser/feat-skills-next-add-browser-sdk-references branch from 8268192 to 1e16d8d Compare July 7, 2026 15:14
@evanpurkhiser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Automated fixes pushed addressing the review feedback on this PR:

  • session-replay.md: fixed the "Employee-only recordings" example. getReplay().flush() alone only uploads already-buffered data — it does not start recording or raise sampling, so unsampled employees got no replay. It now guards on getReplayId() and calls start() when no replay is active, with corrected prose.

Unreviewed LLM-port correction; please verify against the SDK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant