-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Edit decision-making.md for spelling, grammar, and content. #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KrishnaRSampath
wants to merge
3
commits into
hackaye:master
Choose a base branch
from
KrishnaRSampath:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,15 +1,39 @@ | ||
| #Decision-making | ||
|
|
||
| There are at least two popular aproaches: | ||
| * Do-ocracy is an organizational way where every individual chooses own role and/or task and does it autonomously or in a team. But accontability sticks to actor who implement task/role but not who is officially assigned. | ||
| * The main advantages of this approach: big motivation and rapid implementation. | ||
| * Disadvantages are burn out of team core. | ||
| * Consensus is an organizational approach where decisions are made by agreement of a whole group of actors. | ||
| * Benefits are sustainibility and deep understanding tack and roles by each member of collective. | ||
| * Drawbacks: Very time consuming and not flexible. | ||
| There are several popular approaches to decision-making, some of which are detailed here: | ||
| * Do-ocracy is an organizational methodology where each individual chooses his/her own role and/or task and does it autonomously or in a team. In this model, accountability sticks to the actor who implements a task/role, not who is officially assigned. | ||
| * Advantages: | ||
| * Fosters a culture of participation and motivates community members to take on responsibilities for the good of the group. | ||
| * Can lead to much more rapid implementation, as there is little in the way of process to curtail progress on tasks. | ||
| * Allows those who want to accomplish something to simply start working toward their goals. | ||
| * Disadvantages: | ||
| * Burnout of team core, especially when people volunteer for too many jobs/tasks. | ||
| * If some key contributors volunteer for a large portion of the tasks, they may begin to resent others for not contributing as much. | ||
| * Some may volunteer to perform a task without the required expertise to complete it, yet there may be no mechanism for taking the volunteer off that self-assigned task. | ||
| * Consensus is an organizational approach where decisions are made by the unanimous agreement of a whole group of actors. | ||
| * Advantages: | ||
| * Reduces social hierarchy, as all members' votes are required to progress forward. | ||
| * Increases participation by all members of a group. | ||
| * Imposes a natural limit on risky or controversial changes. | ||
| are sustainability and deep understanding tack and roles by each member of collective. | ||
| * Prevents minority viewpoints within a group from being overrun. | ||
| * Disadvantages: | ||
| * Extremely time-consuming, as a single dissenter can prevent forward progress. | ||
| * Difficult to overturn previously-made decisions as members who espoused those ideas initially may be unwilling to recant. | ||
| * Can cause social pressure on all participants to reach quicker decisions, paradoxically resulting in some groups speeding too quickly toward decision-making. | ||
| * Parliamentary Procedure is a highly organized system of decision-making, governed by a fixed set of rules (such as Robert's Rules of Order). | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The Parliamentary Procedure section should not be indented. |
||
| * Advantages: | ||
| * Highly structured set of rules governs discussion, preventing personal attacks and the like from becoming commonplace, and reducing ambiguity. | ||
| * Generally requires a quorum of members present, to prevent the risk of a clandestine meeting held to push through a small group's agenda. | ||
| * Majority voting provides a clear, objective way to measure when a decision has been reached when a question is called to a vote. | ||
| * Disadvantages: | ||
| * Minority viewpoints can be overridden by votes, leading to a situation where an unscrupulous majority group could seize complete control over the body. | ||
| * Discussion can become interrupted by the process moving too quickly to a vote. | ||
| * People may feel less personally invested in the outcome from the other two systems (especially where they voted against the decision that was reached). | ||
|
|
||
| **Option: The better way is to combine the methods. | ||
|
|
||
| ##References | ||
| * https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-ocracy | ||
| * https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus | ||
| * http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/ConsensusDecisionMaking | ||
| * https://communitywiki.org/wiki/ParliamentaryProcedure | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line 18 looks like a leftover from the previous version.