Skip to content

HPCC-35977 feat(esp) When deploying a query, record the source in the workunit#21191

Open
ghalliday wants to merge 1 commit intohpcc-systems:candidate-9.14.xfrom
ghalliday:issue35977
Open

HPCC-35977 feat(esp) When deploying a query, record the source in the workunit#21191
ghalliday wants to merge 1 commit intohpcc-systems:candidate-9.14.xfrom
ghalliday:issue35977

Conversation

@ghalliday
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday commented Apr 9, 2026

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@ghalliday ghalliday requested a review from asselitx April 9, 2026 11:18
@ghalliday
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Both a bugfix and a feature. A previous change (HPCC-34962) fixed a bug, but meant it was not possible to link the queries back to the original.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026

🔄 Upmerge Test Results

Status: ✅ All branches merged successfully
PR: #21191 - HPCC-35977 feat(esp) When deploying a query, record the source in the workunit
Base Branch: candidate-9.14.x
Test Time: 2026-04-09 11:19:25 UTC

✅ Successful Branches (3)

  • candidate-10.0.x
  • candidate-10.2.x
  • master
    This comment was automatically generated by the upmerge test workflow.

@ghalliday ghalliday requested a review from mckellyln April 9, 2026 14:50

StringBuffer originalDllName(sourceFilename);
if (!originalDllName.length())
originalDllName.append(name).append(SharedObjectExtension);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be sensible to ensure name is non-empty somewhere as I don't see that name is validated to be non-empty in the calling chain. It is passed through from the incoming request.

… workunit

Signed-off-by: Gavin Halliday <gavin.halliday@lexisnexis.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mckellyln mckellyln left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok
Approved.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔄 Upmerge Test Results

Status: ✅ All branches merged successfully
PR: #21191 - HPCC-35977 feat(esp) When deploying a query, record the source in the workunit
Base Branch: candidate-9.14.x
Test Time: 2026-04-10 17:28:01 UTC

✅ Successful Branches (3)

  • candidate-10.0.x
  • candidate-10.2.x
  • master
    This comment was automatically generated by the upmerge test workflow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants