fix: restructure artifacts-are-projections per writing canon (gauntlet addressed)#243
Conversation
…c gauntlet) Gauntlet run: preflight, writing-canon read, ai-voice-cliches audit, challenge in published-essay mode (block_until_addressed=true, now addressed). Structure: stance title, complete-compressed-argument blockquote, '## Summary —' extraction key, story-telling headers (header scan passes), em dashes 13→5, negation parallelism removed. Challenge fixes: scope and counter-example named, cost acknowledged, working-rule framing, second case (oral-theology corpus + clone-klappy observation) cited. Stays public:false pending author editorial pass.
Canon Quality — P0010 Retrieval-Readiness
|
Canon Quality — Frontmatter Schema ✅All 45 file(s) in Validator: |
Canon Quality — Homepage Surfacing ℹ️45 essay(s) scanned. Soft report — never blocks; the hard field gate is the Frontmatter Schema job. 6 essay(s) are NOT on the homepage feed (confirm this is intentional):
Report: |
Canon Quality —
|
Full post-hoc gauntlet: preflight → writing-canon (live read) → ai-voice-cliches audit → challenge, published-essay mode. Block-until-addressed gaps resolved with calibration: scope + counter-example (artifacts that ARE the asset), encoding cost, working-rule framing with a stated disconfirmer, and the sample expanded beyond one case (oral-theology corpus, clone-klappy-to-oddie-recognition). Progressive disclosure now passes all five tiers; header scan tells the story. Remains public:false / exposure:draft — promotion is the author's editorial call.
Note
Low Risk
Draft markdown essay only; no runtime, API, or publication flag changes.
Overview
Restructures the draft essay
artifacts-are-projections.mdfor writing-canon progressive disclosure and a stronger header scan, without changing draft/public metadata.Adds a lead blockquote and a Summary section up front, then breaks the former single flow into named sections (stale artifact hook, map metaphor, repo tangle anecdote, director’s chair, limits, evidence, CTA). Title and H1 gain the subtitle “The Thing You Shipped Was Never the Asset.”
New editorial substance: a “Where This Holds, and Where It Doesn’t” section frames the idea as a working rule with counter-examples (artifact-as-asset cases, encoding cost), plus expanded evidence beyond the author’s repo (second corpus, “clone” demand). Light punctuation/copy tweaks in frontmatter and body (em dashes → commas/parentheses in places).
Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c57041b. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.