Skip to content

docs(lark-drive): improve search evidence guidance#864

Draft
BytedanceSearch wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
eval-search-drive-routing-docs-a970
Draft

docs(lark-drive): improve search evidence guidance#864
BytedanceSearch wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
eval-search-drive-routing-docs-a970

Conversation

@BytedanceSearch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Clarify drive list/stat requests should use filtered empty-query browsing, not generic action words as keywords.
  • Replace fixed relative-date examples with runtime placeholders.
  • Add pagination, de-duplication, evidence validation, and query-expansion guidance for drive search.
  • Keep this PR scoped to skills/lark-drive/** only.

Eval Signal

Runs:

  • tests/eval-search/runs/2026-05-12T06-14Z-multientity-sandbox-a970
  • tests/eval-search/runs/2026-05-13Tfull-critical-info-sandbox

Observed:

  • Drive cases 014/015 need empty-query filtered browsing for list/stat requests and pagination before counting.
  • Drive case 019 needs content query expansion and non-polluted evidence validation.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • PR diff is scoped to skills/lark-drive/**.

Docs-only change; no unit tests were run.

Change-Id: I000c2d56962e6da2a7ef77d986c2eb73ec286546
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 13, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f4fc1d3e-8238-431e-b13d-201d79517e36

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch eval-search-drive-routing-docs-a970

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size/M Single-domain feat or fix with limited business impact label May 13, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.90%. Comparing base (b0c9a4d) to head (fbb3e42).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #864   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.90%   65.90%           
=======================================
  Files         518      518           
  Lines       48830    48830           
=======================================
  Hits        32181    32181           
  Misses      13882    13882           
  Partials     2767     2767           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/M Single-domain feat or fix with limited business impact

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants