docs(lark-vc): clarify meeting search evidence flow

[BytedanceSearch]

Summary

• Clarify that VC list-style requests should filter by time/person first, not generic query words.
• Replace fixed relative-date examples with runtime placeholders.
• Add guidance to fetch notes/recordings/minutes before summarizing agendas, decisions, or participation.
• Keep this PR scoped to skills/lark-vc/** only.

Eval Signal

Runs:

• tests/eval-search/runs/2026-05-12T06-14Z-multientity-sandbox-a970
• tests/eval-search/runs/2026-05-13Tfull-critical-info-sandbox

Observed:

• VC list-style cases need time/person filtering first, then notes/recording fetch for agenda or participation summaries.
• "All/stat/sort" requests should paginate and de-duplicate before summarizing.

Validation

• git diff --check
• PR diff is scoped to skills/lark-vc/**.

Docs-only change; no unit tests were run.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 74fbe93d-a53b-41fe-8ba3-e05bbc49aff0

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch eval-search-vc-routing-docs-a970

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.90%. Comparing base (b0c9a4d) to head (bdd318c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #866   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.90%   65.90%           
=======================================
  Files         518      518           
  Lines       48830    48830           
=======================================
  Hits        32181    32181           
  Misses      13882    13882           
  Partials     2767     2767           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.