Skip to content

larsen66/ai-agency-market-research

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

8 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AI Agency Market Research 2026

Competitive intelligence database of 233 AI agent and automation companies, with deep-dive analysis on market positioning, sales funnels, pricing, and strategic opportunities for new AI agencies targeting SMBs.

What's Inside

Dataset: research.csv

A structured research database with 233 companies and 39 columns covering:

Column Group Fields
Identity URL, Type, Headline, Founding Year
Services & Stack Services offered, tech stack (verified where possible)
Market Position Size, Target Market, Geography, Team Size
Pricing Model, Range, Detail
Sales Intelligence Offer Structure, Sales Approach, Positioning Angle, Full Funnel (Hook → Entry → Upsell → Close)
Strategic Fields Primary Pain Point, AI Use Case, AI Readiness, Urgency Trigger, Decision Maker, Budget Estimate, Objection Risk, Priority Score, Next Best Action
Evidence Pain Evidence, Pain Evidence Type, Pain Evidence Summary
Social & Marketing Social Posts, Post Summaries, Engagement Style, Social Themes, Marketing Words, Marketing Angle
Quality Verification Status (Claimed/Verified/Inferred/Estimated), Confidence (Low/Medium/High), Last Checked

Analysis Reports

reports/first-offer-strategy.md

Data-driven analysis of the best first offer for a new AI agency targeting SMBs. Evaluates 8 offer categories across 9 dimensions (ease of sale, speed to result, ROI clarity, delivery complexity, standardizability, upsell potential, recurring revenue, crowdedness). Conclusion: AI Lead Response & Follow-Up System is the strongest first wedge.

reports/professional-services-market.md

Deep-dive into the AI operations opportunity for small professional service firms (law, accounting, consulting). Includes competitor snapshots, pricing benchmarks, compliance analysis, sub-niche selection, and go/no-go verdict. Conclusion: Start with small immigration law firms, selling AI intake + operations follow-through at ~$1,500-2,500/mo retainer.

reports/agentic-agency-leads.md

Curated list of agencies building real agentic AI systems (multi-agent orchestration, tool-using agents, ReAct-style architectures) — filtered from the main dataset for firms doing genuine agent engineering vs. chatbot wrappers.

Key Findings

Market Landscape

  • 233 companies researched in total
  • ~55 are clearly SMB-oriented AI/automation agencies
  • Most common entry points: free consultation (~62 companies), AI audit/readiness assessment (~55), retainer/support (~79)
  • Low/no-code stack (n8n, Make, Zapier, HubSpot) appears in ~65 companies

What's Overrated

  • AI strategy consulting as a standalone first offer
  • "Custom AI agents" as a vague umbrella positioning
  • Broad "AI transformation" messaging for SMBs
  • Free AI audits without clear implementation path

What Actually Sells to SMBs

  • Lead response and follow-up automation (strongest ROI story)
  • Customer support / AI receptionist (clear pain, easy demo)
  • Internal ops automation sprints (saved hours, easy to scope)
  • Fixed-fee implementations with monthly optimization retainers

Offer Category Scoring (SMB Fit)

Offer Ease of Sale Speed to Result ROI Clarity Crowdedness
Lead Response System Very High Very High Very High High but manageable
Support AI / Receptionist High High High High
Internal Ops Sprint High High High Medium
Document / Knowledge Medium Medium Medium Medium
AI Audit Medium Low Low Very High
Custom AI Agents Low Low Low High
AI Strategy Consulting Low Very Low Very Low Very High

Research Methodology

Each company goes through a 5-round pipeline:

  1. 4 parallel Google searches — services, LinkedIn, reviews, founder/funding
  2. 4 parallel website fetches — /services, /about, /pricing, /case-studies
  3. 4 gap-filling searches — pricing rates, social presence, client verification, financials
  4. Homepage funnel analysis — every CTA, form, booking system, lead magnet
  5. Cross-reference & red flags — website claims vs. LinkedIn headcount, client verification

Hard Rules

  • Never trust /blog/ pages — blogs are SEO marketing, not operational truth
  • Claimed vs. Verified — every data point is tagged with its source type
  • "Not found" over guessing — no inferred data presented as fact
  • Public sources only — no paid databases (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Semrush, etc.)

How to Use This Data

If you're starting an AI agency:

  • Study the sales funnels of successful agencies in your target niche
  • Use the offer category scoring to pick your first wedge
  • Read the first-offer report for packaging and pricing guidance

If you're doing competitive research:

  • Filter research.csv by Type, Target Market, or Geography
  • Compare pricing models and ranges across similar companies
  • Study marketing language patterns in the Marketing Words/Angle columns

If you're a buyer evaluating AI agencies:

  • Check Verification Status and Confidence columns
  • Compare claimed capabilities against Case Studies evidence
  • Look at the Red Flags noted in the full funnel analysis

Data Quality

  • Verification Status: each row tagged as Claimed, Verified, Inferred, or Estimated
  • Confidence: Low, Medium, or High per row
  • Last Checked: date of last material verification
  • All research uses publicly available sources only

License

This research is provided as-is for informational purposes. The dataset reflects publicly available information as of April 2026.

About

233 AI agencies analyzed: traffic, funnels, pricing, decision makers. Live dashboard: ai-research-db.vercel.app

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages