Skip to content

Security: luxfi/corona

Security

SECURITY.md

Security policy

Reporting vulnerabilities

Please report cryptographic or implementation vulnerabilities privately to security@lux.network — encrypted with the team key listed at https://lux.network/security/key.asc. Public disclosure happens after a fix lands and downstream consumers have had a 14-day private window.

What is in-scope

Corona is production-hardened reference implementation for Ring-LWE threshold signing in Quasar consensus, and a NIST MPTC submission package. The following are in-scope for responsible disclosure:

  • Specification ambiguity that leads to an exploitable verifier behaviour.
  • Threshold-protocol soundness gaps (forgery, key-recovery, share extraction, rogue-key, adaptive-corruption breaks).
  • Constant-time violations in code paths that touch a secret share, a Gaussian sample, or a Lagrange-aggregation intermediate.
  • KAT mismatches between the Go reference and the C++ port at ~/work/luxcpp/crypto/corona/ (cross-runtime byte-equality is a load-bearing invariant).
  • Pedersen DKG (dkg2/) hiding-blind leakage or commitment binding failures.
  • Reshare-protocol (reshare/) failures to preserve (A, bTilde) across committee rotation.
  • Activation-cert (reshare/activation.go) bypass or accept-on- failure paths.
  • Information leaks via logging, panics on secret-correlated paths, or variable-time equality.
  • Cryptanalysis of the underlying Boschini et al. ePrint 2024/1113 construction or of Corona's specific parameter set (N = 256, q = 0x1000000004A01).

What is NOT in-scope

  • Performance or implementation efficiency complaints (file an issue).
  • DoS attacks against the reference implementation that don't affect the threshold-correctness invariants.
  • Issues exclusively in the M-LWE sibling at luxfi/pulsar — file there. Corona and Pulsar are independent libraries with no shared types.
  • Issues in lens-specific code (lens/) — Corona's threshold path does not depend on lens.
  • Issues in the legacy dkg/ (Feldman VSS without blinding) — documented as broken for public broadcast; replaced by dkg2/ (Pedersen DKG with hiding blinds). Production deployments use dkg2/.

CVE assignment

Corona maintainers will request CVEs for any in-scope vulnerability prior to public disclosure. CVE numbers will be embedded in the ePrint changelog and the release tag's commit message.

NIST MPTC submission disclosures

Findings discovered after the 2026-Nov-16 MPTC package submission deadline will be added to the submission's "known limitations" appendix and disclosed publicly per NIST's MPTC public-analysis process (no embargo window for findings against actively-submitted MPTC packages).

Coordinated disclosure with Pulsar

Corona and Pulsar are independent submissions but share Lux as a common author and overlap in some operational mitigations (e.g., aggregator-host hardening, mlock pinning). A vulnerability that affects both packages will be disclosed to both security@lux.network mailing lists simultaneously to enable coordinated patching.

Disclosure timeline (default)

  • T+0: Private report received at security@lux.network.
  • T+5 days: Acknowledgement + initial triage; CVE requested if in-scope.
  • T+30 days: Fix landed in main; tagged patch release; private disclosure to downstream consumers (Quasar consensus, etc.).
  • T+44 days: Public disclosure (advisory + CVE published).

Faster disclosure timelines apply for critical findings (immediate exploitability with no mitigation). Slower timelines apply for research-level findings requiring spec consultation with NIST MPTC reviewers.

There aren't any published security advisories