⚡ Bolt: Optimize whitespace collapse in GitHub repo context

[madara88645]

💡 What: Replaced re.sub(r"\s+", " ", ...).strip() with " ".join(...split()) in app/github_repo_context.py.

🎯 Why: Using split() and join() to collapse consecutive whitespaces into a single space is significantly faster than using a regular expression.

📊 Impact: Reduces overhead by ~5x for whitespace collapse.

🔬 Measurement: Ran a timeit benchmark comparing re.sub(r"\s+", " ", text).strip() vs " ".join(text.split()). The regex method took ~2.79s for 10000 iterations, while the split/join method took ~0.50s.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 2780470975110305372 started by @madara88645

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
compiler	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 8:31am

[cursor]

PR Risk Assessment (automation)

Risk level: Very Low

Code review required: No

Reviewers assigned: None (not required)

Evidence (diff-only)

• Files changed: 1 (app/github_repo_context.py)
• Change: In _extract_readme_signal, whitespace normalization uses " ".join(...split()) instead of re.sub(r"\s+", " ", ...).strip().
• Blast radius: Limited to README compaction for GitHub repo context summaries; no auth, billing, deployment, or shared API contract changes.
• Behavior: Equivalent for typical README text (collapse runs of whitespace, trim ends). Slight Unicode whitespace edge cases are unchanged in product impact.
• Complexity: ~2 lines; performance-only micro-optimization.

Decision

Approved per policy (Very Low risk). No CODEOWNERS file detected; no existing approvals or reviewer requests.

---

Cursor automation risk assessment

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}