Skip to content

🧹 [Remove unused function selectorHasParallelArm]#95

Merged
matdev83 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-unused-function-selectorhasparallelarm-9746793525999980983
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

🧹 [Remove unused function selectorHasParallelArm]#95
matdev83 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-unused-function-selectorhasparallelarm-9746793525999980983

Conversation

@matdev83

@matdev83 matdev83 commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • 🎯 What: Removed unused function selectorHasParallelArm from internal/core/runtime/parallel_race.go.
  • 💡 Why: The function is not exported and is not used within its package. Removing it improves maintainability and removes dead code.
  • Verification: Formatted with go fmt ./... and ran the full test suite with go test ./.... Also verified removal manually via bash commands.
  • Result: A cleaner codebase with less dead code.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 9746793525999980983 started by @matdev83

Co-authored-by: matdev83 <211248003+matdev83@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@matdev83, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 56 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 522bf6d7-0557-4442-a168-5a33a349f2eb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96d7ab5 and c04c55e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/core/runtime/parallel_race.go

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@matdev83 matdev83 merged commit d8e34f7 into main Jul 1, 2026
2 checks passed
@matdev83 matdev83 deleted the remove-unused-function-selectorhasparallelarm-9746793525999980983 branch July 1, 2026 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant