Skip to content

Add CodeQL code scanning workflow#214

Merged
oschwald merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-codeql-workflow
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Add CodeQL code scanning workflow#214
oschwald merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
add-codeql-workflow

Conversation

@claude

@claude claude Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Requested by William Storey, Greg Oschwald · Slack thread


What: GeoIP2-ruby previously ran CodeQL via GitHub "default setup". This moves it to an advanced workflow file (consistent with the org's other repos), scanning the Ruby code with CodeQL on every pull request and weekly.

How: Adds .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (languages: ruby, no build step since Ruby is interpreted, github/codeql-action v4.37.0 pinned by SHA) and a codeql group to the github-actions Dependabot ecosystem so codeql-action bumps arrive as one grouped PR (per STF-983). Default setup has been disabled on this repo so the advanced workflow's results upload cleanly.


Generated by Claude Code

@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@claude
claude Bot marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2026 21:06
@oschwald
oschwald merged commit 990ee6c into main Jul 21, 2026
37 checks passed
@oschwald
oschwald deleted the add-codeql-workflow branch July 21, 2026 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants