Adapt search performance trace documentation#3555
Conversation
Some of the search performance trace steps have been renamed in the engine. related to: meilisearch/meilisearch#6323
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 52 minutes and 27 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated documentation for performance debugging by renaming and reorganizing stage names in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@capabilities/full_text_search/advanced/debug_search_performance.mdx`:
- Line 64: Update the sentence describing stage naming in the performanceDetails
section to use plain language: replace the abbreviation "e.g.," with "for
example" so it reads like "Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a
separator (for example `search > keyword ranking`). Locate the text that
references performanceDetails and the phrase "Stage names are hierarchical,
using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword ranking`)" and change only the
abbreviation to "for example" to match documentation style.
- Around line 188-189: The two dense bullets "High `search > evaluate query`"
and "High `search > keyword ranking`" should be rewritten into shorter, clearer
sentences: for `search > evaluate query` split the run-on into two sentences
that say a complex query with many words or synonyms builds an expensive query
tree and suggest simplifying the query or reducing synonyms; for `search >
keyword ranking` split into two sentences that state many ranking iterations
occur when offset/limit or result size is large and suggest reducing
offset/limit, constraining [searchable attributes], or lowering `maxTotalHits`;
update the exact bullet texts so each action recommendation is its own short
sentence and remove extra commas to improve scanability.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f01d27a0-0fd3-48b1-a836-070db9a2579f
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
capabilities/full_text_search/advanced/debug_search_performance.mdx
| ## Understanding performance stages | ||
|
|
||
| Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword search`). | ||
| Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword ranking`). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace e.g., with for example on Line 64
Please switch to the plain-language form to match docs style.
Suggested edit
-Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword ranking`).
+Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (for example, `search > keyword ranking`).As per coding guidelines, "Prefer 'for example' and 'that is' over 'e.g.' and 'i.e.' so the text stays accessible."
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword ranking`). | |
| Each key in `performanceDetails` represents a stage of the search pipeline. Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a separator (for example, `search > keyword ranking`). |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@capabilities/full_text_search/advanced/debug_search_performance.mdx` at line
64, Update the sentence describing stage naming in the performanceDetails
section to use plain language: replace the abbreviation "e.g.," with "for
example" so it reads like "Stage names are hierarchical, using `>` as a
separator (for example `search > keyword ranking`). Locate the text that
references performanceDetails and the phrase "Stage names are hierarchical,
using `>` as a separator (e.g., `search > keyword ranking`)" and change only the
abbreviation to "for example" to match documentation style.
Some of the search performance trace steps have been renamed in the engine.
related to: meilisearch/meilisearch#6323
Checklist
For internal Meilisearch team member only:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes