Skip to content

Embed skills in resources folder, refer to by README file#1459

Open
nturinski wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/copilotOnRailsAgentsfrom
nat/embeddedAgentInstructions
Open

Embed skills in resources folder, refer to by README file#1459
nturinski wants to merge 3 commits into
feat/copilotOnRailsAgentsfrom
nat/embeddedAgentInstructions

Conversation

@nturinski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds the azure-project-plan agent — a dedicated planner that gathers requirements interactively, writes .azure/project-plan.md, and hands off to the scaffold agent. Strict phase ordering: write plan → open preview → wait for approval → hand off. No code, configs, or project files are created before approval.

The agent file itself stays thin (just the VS Code-specific workflow rules: openPlanView preview command, approval gate, startProjectScaffold hand-off). All planning guidance — workspace inference rules, vscode_askQuestions flow, service classification (Essential vs. Enhancement), canonical project structure, and the standard error contract — lives in resources/agents/azure-project-plan/README.md, mirroring the convention used by the scaffold agent.

Also changes the local-debug agent to point at azure-local-debug/README.md. Also adds HTML preview to the azure plan view.

@nturinski nturinski requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2026 22:40
@nturinski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

…nat/embeddedAgentInstructions

# Conflicts:
#	package.json
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented May 27, 2026

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Resolved the merge conflict in package.json. The conflict was in the chatAgents array — the base branch added azcode.agent.md while this branch added azure-project-plan.agent.md. Both entries are now kept in the resolved merge commit (674b053).

Comment thread resources/agents/azure-project-plan.agent.md Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants