-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.7k
Offload canvas drawing operations to a worker #20729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Aditi-1400
wants to merge
13
commits into
mozilla:master
Choose a base branch
from
Aditi-1400:worker-drawing
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,726
−228
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7ab4143
Extract ObjectHandler from WorkerTransport
Aditi-1400 c5b0368
Adds RendererWorker class for offloading canvas
Aditi-1400 b425a10
Add TR-based canvas filter detection in core layer
Aditi-1400 4d5968b
Add object forwarding between main thread and renderer worker
Aditi-1400 06abbab
Add graphics initialization and operator list execution in renderer w…
Aditi-1400 b2f5778
Adapt viewer and tests for OffscreenCanvas renderer worker
Aditi-1400 91e835a
Enable WebGPU in renderer worker
Aditi-1400 7ba3f6b
Wait for GPU rendering
Aditi-1400 ad45c15
Add support for images and dependency tracker
Aditi-1400 e688602
Make error handling for forwarding objects better
Aditi-1400 559a37f
Couple the renderer-worker handler lifecycle to its consumers
Aditi-1400 8436cb5
Allow PDFs checkboxes while rendering in worker
Aditi-1400 9599549
Address review comments
Aditi-1400 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The two loops look very similar, maybe we could have an helper function to avoid redundancy.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did try doing that, in one of the earlier versions of the patch, I think this is probably the commit which captures the idea, later though I felt it added too much complexity and reduced readability of the code without significant returns, so I isolated them, let me know if you prefer extracting the common bits though, it should be a minimal effort to go back to that approach