Add API unit-tests for getSignatures and getSignatureData (PR 21247 follow-up)#21541
Merged
timvandermeij merged 1 commit intoJul 5, 2026
Merged
Conversation
…47 follow-up) Note that PR 21247 did include "local" unit-tests, however they don't cover all of the relevant API/Worker code-paths (which is noticeable in the coverage data). The new unit-test added here uses a PDF document already present in the test-suite, and generally speaking testing a real-world PDF shouldn't hurt.
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Snuffleupagus
temporarily deployed
to
code-coverage
GitHub Actions
Inactive
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21541 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.40% 89.42% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 262 262
Lines 66739 66739
==========================================
+ Hits 59668 59680 +12
+ Misses 7071 7059 -12
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
timvandermeij
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2026
Collaborator
|
Good idea; thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note that PR #21247 did include "local" unit-tests, however they don't cover all of the relevant API/Worker code-paths (which is noticeable in the coverage data).
The new unit-test added here uses a PDF document already present in the test-suite, and generally speaking testing a real-world PDF shouldn't hurt.