Skip to content

docs: move ttshivers to Emeritus#2509

Open
MikeMcC399 wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
MikeMcC399:move/ttshivers-to-emeritus
Open

docs: move ttshivers to Emeritus#2509
MikeMcC399 wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
MikeMcC399:move/ttshivers-to-emeritus

Conversation

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refs: #2506

Description

ttshivers is moved from:

to

Many thanks to @ttshivers on behalf of the current team for your valuable previous contributions!

Motivation and Context

During a reorganization related to the Governance change from Docker Working Group to "open maintainer model" in February 2026, ttshivers was added to the published list of Collaborators.

ttshivers was last active in this repo in Oct 2020.

Testing Details

N/A

Types of changes

  • Documentation
  • Version change (Update, remove or add more Node.js versions)
  • Variant change (Update, remove or add more variants, or versions of variants)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (none of the above)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 force-pushed the move/ttshivers-to-emeritus branch from 9ea4f67 to e107368 Compare May 19, 2026 07:30
@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 force-pushed the move/ttshivers-to-emeritus branch from e107368 to 6bb6ebc Compare May 19, 2026 07:32
@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The markdown-link-check issue

[✖] https://debian.org/ → Status: 0

is assumed to be a transient problem and should be ignored for the purposes of this PR. If it persists, it will need to be investigated separately and corrected.

@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2026 07:35
@MikeMcC399 MikeMcC399 requested review from nschonni, sxa and ttshivers May 19, 2026 07:35
Comment thread README.md

### Emeritus

#### Former Maintainers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe just drop the headings and have the list directly under Emeritus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be OK with me. History of maintainers / collaborators is anyway a bit confusing due to some people swapping between roles.

I'll wait before changing though, in case anybody has different views.

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

According to the GOVERNANCE model, this issue should remain open for minimum 5 days to allow feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants