chore: import codebase#1
Open
itsjoeoui wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
Legal RiskThe following dependencies were released under a license that RecommendationReach out to your security team or Semgrep admin to address this issue. In special cases, exceptions may be made for dependencies with violating licenses, however, the general recommendation is to avoid using a dependency under such a license MPL-2.0 non-standard |
059f0d5 to
900d72b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Imports the codebase from the existing private repo as a single squashed commit. This is the initial code drop for the open-source
instrorepo.Ticket Alignment
Does the Linear ticket capture the evolution of the development which led to this implementation? If the implementation diverged from the original plan, update the ticket or note the delta below.
Reviewers
If the right reviewers aren't obvious, explain your selection:
Verification
Provide evidence that verifies you've met the goals of the scope of this ticket/PR. This should provide the reviewer enough information to not have to reproduce your results, but rather evaluate your results against the goals. Use whatever best demonstrates it — e.g. screenshots, a Nominal Core Workbook link, logs, repro steps + result, a staging link. If omitting, explain why.
Regression & Future Safety
Unit tests
Were unit tests added or updated? If existing tests cover this, say so explicitly. If omitting, explain why.
Additional coverage
Did you go further? E.g. end-to-end tests, error reporting, data review coverage, alerting. Document it here — this is how we build better habits over time. If omitting, explain why.
Notes for reviewers
Optional — call out specific files, edge cases, or decisions you'd like eyes on. If you identified out-of-scope risks, consider creating Linear tickets to track them.