Repository navigation
pm-dispatch(triage): each round reads every main and queue red since the last round record, answers pm:retriage on pm:epic cards too, and a lane can hold a head with a Contract-review-hold: line #27370
Description
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Filing gate ③ (maintainer-directed). Triage's own review of what it missed on 2026-10-28 and 10-29, offered in the triage session, and the maintainer: 「立卡」 (2026-10-29). ⛔ Not a claim. Lane domain:skills. Tier H (.claude/**).
What happened (measured)
- Main red with no anchor.
- Push
CIwent red twice onTest Core (5/8), at 2026-10-28T15:14Z (run 40713919581) and 2026-10-28T15:41Z (run 40718500281). The only annotation iscreate-objectstack … pnpm run test exited (1). - Triage was stopped from about 15:10Z to 00:51Z. Its first round back read only the latest runs, so neither red got a p0 anchor (convention ①, pm-dispatch(p0): a lane's p0 card is dispatched at once — no batch, depth-wait or concurrency cap holds it, and lower-priority dev work pauses to make room; main or merge-queue red is graded p0 at first touch #27047).
- It was found by chance in the second round (R733) and folded into tests: SQLite-backed suites in cli, runtime, driver-turso, driver-sql and service-package time out under shard disk load (fsync); give them the #27076 TMPDIR treatment #27306.
- Push
- A
pm:retriageon an epic waited about 10 hours. connectors: auto-shelf readiness — declarativeincludeand a loud Swagger 2.0 refusal for connector-openapi;tools/listpagination, fatal 401 and a tool-snapshot hash for connector-mcp; an offline spec-normalization tool #26709 (pm:epic) asked triage three questions at 2026-10-28T15:58Z. The triage sweep skipspm:epiccards as coordination nodes, so the request was not seen until a manual blocked-card audit on 10-29. - A lane's "don't review this head yet" had no shape.
- On feat(spec):
currencyMode: 'record'+currencyField— a record-mode amount points at a sibling ISO 4217 code field (multi-currency M0-1) #27268 the epic PM wrote in prose that the head would move and that it would hangneeds:contract-reviewafter the last merge (6472451890). - Triage had already claimed under gap rule (b), and then had to withdraw. Free text cannot be read reliably, so the next lane hold will cause the same churn.
- On feat(spec):
Wanted
One line each, in the files that own these rules, with no new gate (「新增门禁默认否」):
- Read the gap, not the moment (
references/triage-duties.md, round steps). Each round reads everymainpush, schedule and merge-queue conclusion since the previous round record's fire time, not just the newest runs.- Any red in that window that has no anchor gets a p0 anchor now. If
mainis green again, the anchor still records the red and names the card that carries the fix. - A round that follows a gap (no record for over 90 minutes) says so in its record.
- Any red in that window that has no anchor gets a p0 anchor now. If
pm:retriageis answered in the round it is seen,pm:epicincluded (references/triage-duties.md, next to 「父单是协调节点」). An epic is never dispatched, but a question a lane or epic PM puts to triage is answered like any other card's.Contract-review-hold:line (references/contract-review.md, beside the claim and hand-off lines of pm-dispatch(contract-review): the lane reviews its own PRs; triage takes only a review nobody is doing, and one claim line per head keeps two reviewers off the same head #27062):- Shape:
Contract-review-hold: <session> · head <sha> · <reason> · until <condition>. - It is per head: a new head clears it. While a hold names the current head, gap rule (b) does not fire.
- The lane that holds owns the review once the condition is met: it hangs
needs:contract-reviewor posts a hand-off. - A hold older than 24 hours with the condition unmet is listed in the triage round record, so a hold cannot become a silent skip.
- Shape:
Acceptance
- The three lines are in those files, and each states its rule once.
scripts/pm/readers, if any parse the claim and hand-off lines (--owed), learn the hold line in the same PR. That is a reader of an existing list, not a new gate.
Related
#27062 (gap rule, claim and hand-off lines) · #27047 (p0 convention ①) · #27345 / #27363 (approval gated on a PASS) · #27306 (the fsync card that now carries the 10-28 reds).
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
Claim: PM loop round 6 (takeover shift, wave 12) · 2026-10-29T06:10Z
Session:
session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1TgAccount:
os-justinBranch:
claude/issue-27370-triage-reads-the-gap-and-hold-lineWorktree:
objectstack-issue-27370Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md(102 lines; items 1–2),.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md(60 / 60; item 3, theContract-review-hold:line beside the claim and hand-off lines),scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs(the one existing reader of the claim / hand-off lines — it learns the hold line: gap rule (b) does not fire while a hold names the current head; a hold older than 24 h with its condition unmet is listed), its self-test; ⛔ nothing else (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model: M (three governed lines + one reader + its pins; two files at their line ceilings — new lines are paid by folding),
mode:subagent,model: opus(dispatch-gates.mjs --tieron the three paths: 「no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 4 declared glob(s)」 ⇒TIER_DEFAULT; the seat reviews the governed text atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER),effort: xhigh(p1)Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(a triage-process card, maintainer-directed: 「立卡」 2026-10-29)Thread-read: none
Premise: holds (filed by triage under gate ③ on the maintainer's 「立卡」; the three measured misses are on the card; #27062's claim and hand-off lines are on
origin/mainc5d4634 contract-review.md L27–28 and read bycheck-owed-reviews.mjs; gap rule (a)(b)(c) at L23–25; PR #27385 landed 06:05Z socontract-review.mdis free). One correction the dev carries: the card says 「Tier H (.claude/**)」 — by SKILL.md 〈路径分叉〉.claude/**is Tier S;scripts/pm/**is off the register; the seat lands it after its own contract reviewSerial constraints cleared: none (
contract-review.mdandtriage-duties.mdare in no open PR and no in-flight claim's file surface after PR #27385;check-owed-reviews.mjslast changed by PR #27295, landed; same-axisarea:devpathin flight: #27048 — disjoint files)Dispatch follows in this wave; the dev opens a draft PR with no
assignees; the seat's contract review atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERand ACCEPT, then the Tier S landing.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
Claim amendment to 6489397583 · 2026-10-29T06:13Z · File surface adds
scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs(+ its self-test): it is the one owner of the sibling line readers (contractReviewHandoff,contractReviewClaims, L892–945 onorigin/mainc5d4634), so theContract-review-hold:recogniser lives there andcheck-owed-reviews.mjsconsumes it — one reader, no second implementation. No in-flight claim names that file (last changed by PR #27295, landed). Everything else in 6489397583 stands.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 27370, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-27370-triage-reads-the-gap-and-hold-line", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27468", "head": "167b0027935bc412f825dbb9bd4859e93eb934ef", "session": "session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Item 1 (triage-duties.md L26-27): each round reads every main push, schedule and merge-queue conclusion since the previous round record's fire time, not only the newest run. An unanchored red in that window gets a p0 anchor in the round; if main is green again it is still filed and names the carrying card. A round with no record for over 90 minutes notes the gap. Item 2 (triage-duties.md L60, beside 「父单永不派发」): a pm:epic card's pm:retriage is answered at once. Item 3 (contract-review.md L29-31): the line `Contract-review-hold: SESSION · head SHA · REASON · until CONDITION`. It is per head; while it names the current head, gap rule (b) does not fire; once the condition is met the holding lane hangs needs:contract-review or posts a hand-off; a hold over 24 h is listed in the triage round record. record-recognisers.mjs reads it with readContractReviewHold / contractReviewHold (newest governs; age is a reading, never a lapse). check-owed-reviews.mjs carries a hold field, lets a live hold hold trigger (b) only, keeps WAIT (no fifth status) and lists holds 24 h or older. No new gate. Both governed files stay at their ceilings (102/102, 60/60), paid by deleting clauses stated elsewhere. Draft PR #27468 is open with no assignees and the skip-changeset label.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md +6 / -6", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md +4 / -4", "scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs +90 / -8", "scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs +171 / -4" ], "line_budget": { ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md": { "lines": "102 -> 102 (ceiling 102, headroom 0)", "new_lines": [ "L26 113 B: 每轮读上份轮次记录 fire 以来全部 main push、schedule 与队列结论,⛔ 不只读最新一跑。", "L27 116 B: 窗内无锚红当轮立 p0 锚卡,main 已转绿照立并点名承修卡;逾 90 分钟无记录则记明断档。" ], "changed_in_place": [ "L9 115 -> 119 B: 读交接与认领行 -> 读交接/认领/hold 行", "L60 119 -> 118 B: dropped 「涉 cloud 整卡归 cloud 车道」, added 「`pm:epic` 卡 `pm:retriage` 即答」, 「路由是分诊的技术判断」 -> 「路由属分诊技术判断」 (same meaning, 3 B)" ], "folded": [ "old L3 「分诊席每次 fire 开局读本文;本文是分诊座位的全部职责。」 (76 B) and its blank separator old L4. Home: SKILL.md L86, the 〈阶段细则索引〉 row (「分诊席每次 fire 开局」 · 「分诊座位职责」). The dropped 「全部」 was untrue: triage duties also live in contract-review.md, state-machine.md L40 and landing-operations.md 约定③.", "L60 clause 「涉 cloud 整卡归 cloud 车道」 (bytes only). Home: SKILL.md L165 domain:cloud row and cross-repo-coordination.md L44, both 「涉 cloud 即整卡归 cloud PM」; triage reads the latter before routing (SKILL.md L85)." ] }, ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md": { "lines": "60 -> 60 (ceiling 60, headroom 0)", "new_lines": [ "L29 113 B: 车道暂缓本 head 送审落 `Contract-review-hold: SESSION · head SHA · REASON · until CONDITION` (the placeholders are angle-bracketed in the file)", "L30 111 B: 新 head 即清;点名现 head 时 (b) 不起;条件满足由持有车道挂等复核标记或落交接行。", "L31 96 B: 逾 24 小时条件未满的 hold 列入分诊轮次记录(`check-owed-reviews.mjs` 标出)。" ], "changed_in_place": [ "L60 113 -> 119 B: 读标记与认领行 -> 读标记与认领/hold 行" ], "folded": [ "old L30-31 -> L33 (111 B), dropping 「(申报面外三面加 ④)」. Home: same file L39 and L41.", "old L43 (118 B), the isolated reviewer's scratch rule. Home: record-recognisers.mjs --brief-template prints it in the brief's ⛔ READ-ONLY block, pinned by that script's self-test case 'scopes scratch to the PR-named directory', plus L44 (the brief starts from that template and keeps its ⛔ lines).", "old L48-49 -> L49 (112 B), dropping 「判据机读已提交树」. Home: same file L17, triage-duties.md L11 and record-recognisers' committed-tree battery." ] }, "ceilings_moved": "none" }, "tests": "record-recognisers --self-test: 297 -> 316 cases, exit 0. New battery 'the Contract-review-hold: line' has 19 cases; SELF_TEST_BATTERY_FLOOR 16 -> 17. check-owed-reviews --self-test: 49 cases / 8 batteries -> 62 / 9, exit 0. New battery 'the hold' has 13 cases; floor 8 -> 9. Both run under pnpm check:pm-record-recognisers on head 167b0027, exit 0. Importers of record-recognisers also exit 0: post-stamped --self-test (735 cases), check-governed-queue-guard --self-test (401, through the real lazy import), mailbox-open --self-test (45). Live read-only run of node scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs before PR open: 22 open PRs (17 draft), 13 owing rows, every row prints hold absent, exit 0, no sweep INCOMPLETE. Ablation NOT RUN: os-dev.md forbids ablating a script (see deviations). The suppression pin carries its own control leg in one case: with no hold the same row reads TAKE '(b) waited 61 min'; with the hold it reads WAIT 'none yet'. So removing the hold.state !== 'live' guard from trigger (b) turns the named case '⭐ a live hold on the current head holds (b)' red.", "gates": "Local subset, derived on the final head 167b0027 after the last commit (no paths, --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack): 4 paths against merge base c5d46341, 40 commands (26 pnpm, 14 node). Every exit was captured before any pipe; all 40 exited 0. dispatch-gates --ran exited 0: '40 derived, 40 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' (a derived zero; every line carries its exit code). Verdict lines: check:pm-dispatch-gates '✓ dispatch-gates self-test (fast tier): 1935 cases pass'; check:pm-record-recognisers 316 + 62 cases; check:pm-skill-ratchet ✓ (contract-review.md 60/60, triage-duties.md 102/102); check:pm-skill-id-lint '✓ check-skill-id-lint: 105 file(s) clean'; check:skill-frame-sync ✓; check:pm-half-states 5066 cases; check:pm-label-write 136 cases (it reads triage-duties.md for RECLAIM_AFTER_HOURS); check:nul-bytes ✓. On the earlier head 0c9c1c53, check:pm-dispatch-gates went red, 1 of 1935: the declaration census pins scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs:77 self-test-reads, and my new header roster line had moved it to :78. 167b0027 folds the roster entry into the existing line, and the gate is green there. pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions exited 3 on the first run (prerequisite: @objectstack/lint and @objectstack/formula unbuilt). I built them under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, turbo cache), and it exits 0 on the final run. Not owed locally: check:dev-prereqs and check:skill-frame-freshness (neither packages/spec nor the four-axis frame is touched), and check-platform-checklist (no export renamed or deleted). Repo-wide scans are CI's. CI on PR #27468 at 167b0027, read once at PR open: 41 check-runs. Success: Governed Surface Queue Guard, Check Changeset, Check PR Size, filter. 20 skipped by path filter. 17 in_progress: the Lint jobs (CI, release & engine; ESLint; PM dispatch-gates; docs & code guards; repo & tooling; three scoped), the Type Check jobs (consumer gates, debt ledger, source gates, workspace), Plan Test Core shards, Test UI, Dogfood Regression Gate, PR-body guards and Auto Label. in_progress is the honest value; I did not wait on them.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a: no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm (Clause-②: no)", "mcp_calls": "0: no MCP GitHub tool, read or write", "api_writes": "2 relay strokes. (1) pr_create through scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches, executed by run 40836089927 as POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft, forced) and POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/27468/labels [skip-changeset]. Read back: body 17117/17117 B identical, assignees none, labels [skip-changeset], draft true. (2) This os-dev-report comment through scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=27370: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/27370/comments. git push ran 4 times on the one branch (the empty-branch probe plus 3 commits); that is not REST. Reads only otherwise: GET the card, its comments, PR 27468 and the head's check-runs.", "deviations": [ "Ablation not run. The order asks for one per reader change. os-dev.md 〈标准条款〉 「消融一行为一次,仅当 diff 改了测试钉住的行为;配置、脚本、workflow、文档 ⛔ 不消融」 forbids ablating a script, and os-dev.md wins on conflict. The suppression pin carries its own control leg (see tests).", "The role definition at the path the order named (the shared checkout /home/user/objectstack, HEAD 3230bdbf) is stale against origin/main c5d46341 on L37/L60. origin/main and the order agree that pr_create carries no assignees, and I followed them.", "AGENTS.md on origin/main (Multi-agent discipline, the Claim paragraph) still says 'the PR's assignee mirrors the card's, set by the executor at pr_create'. That contradicts os-dev.md L37 on main and this order. I followed the order and os-dev.md: no assignees, read back as none. Named here, not resolved (AGENTS.md is outside the surface).", "'One line each': item 1 takes two lines (113 + 116 B), because its three clauses cannot fit one 120 B line. Item 3 takes three (template, rule, 24 h listing). Item 2 is in place on L60.", "Item 2 is on L60, not L75. 「父单是协调节点」 has zero hits under .claude/ and scripts/pm/ at c5d46341. L60 carries 「父单永不派发」. L75's exceptions govern the stale-premise re-check (L73-75), while answering pm:retriage is state-machine.md L40's rule.", "Mechanism hypothesis 1 is partly falsified for item 3's record clause. The 24 h listing sits in contract-review.md L31, not near triage-duties.md L16. The recogniser's self-test may only read the governed files that GOVERNED_READ_FLOOR (dispatch-gates.data.mjs, outside the surface) declares for it, project-forms.md and contract-review.md, and it pins 「24 小时」 there. This also matches the ruling's file for item 3.", "Mechanism hypothesis 2 is partly falsified. contractReviewHandoff( and contractReviewClaims( have exactly one consumer outside their own file, check-owed-reviews.mjs; check-half-states.mjs and check-handover.mjs do not call them. The recogniser is additive: new exports only, no signature change.", "No package is touched, so there is no ① closure build and no ② package test/typecheck. test:repo was not run locally: no repo-project test was edited and the derivation does not name it. It is CI's.", "Mechanism hypothesis 3 is confirmed. The derivation named check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-record-recognisers, check:skill-frame-sync and the rest. It did not name check:pm-governed-prose or check:self-test-wired as pnpm families; check-self-test-wired.mjs ran as a direct node command and exited 0." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: domain:skills seat · noted, not filed. AGENTS.md on origin/main c5d46341 (Multi-agent discipline, Claim paragraph) still reads 'the PR's assignee mirrors the card's, set by the executor at pr_create'. os-dev.md L37/L60 on main says a dev's pr_create carries no assignees. This is drift between two governed agent texts, outside the three filing classes. Dedupe words: assignee mirrors card, pr_create assignees, executor assignee." ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 27370, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-27370-triage-reads-the-gap-and-hold-line", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27468", "head": "168cb1e8f651edbb16204f9945c0b53c9603151d", "session": "session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Rework round on triage's contract-review record 6491338629 (seat decision 6491385759), one commit 168cb1e8 on top of 167b0027, no merge (PR mergeable=clean; main touched none of the four files). Should-fix 1: triage-duties.md L28 (was L27) now files an anchor for every unanchored window red and grades it 「照首触定级」, i.e. by L30's first-touch grading (main full red and deterministic queue red p0, a flake anchor raised only once read as deterministic), so it no longer grades wider than L30; the green-again clause and the 90-minute gap clause are kept. Should-fix 2: new L3 restores a TRUE scope bound: 「本文与技能他处点名分诊之条(复审、摘 `pm:retriage`、约定③ 等)即分诊座位的全部职责。」 It is a closed-world bound (this file plus every clause elsewhere in the skill that names triage), because the enumerated form 'this file + the three homes' measured false (see deviations). Paid by folding old L99 「需裁事项攒批(≤5 项/批,每项一行带推荐),一句同意即全链执行。」, whose home is lanes/director.md 〈职责二:决裁勤务〉 L48 (≤5 cards per batch, every card presented) and L56 (one batch per reply, 「一字即可」) under SKILL.md L276 (the director is the only presenting seat), with 「方向性授权覆盖整条执行链」 still in this file at L99. Should-fix 3: contractReviewHold reads PER HEAD: the newest READABLE hold naming the current head is live whatever is posted after it; a newer readable hold naming an earlier head does not clear it (only a new head clears, L30 「新 head 即清;点名现 head 时 (b) 不起」); an unreadable line holds nothing and voids nothing; every unreadable hold line is returned in `unreadable` (comment id, stamp, quoted line) on every reading; a thread whose every hold line is unreadable reads `unreadable` (unchanged). check-owed-reviews rows carry `hold.unreadable` and print ` ⚠️ N unreadable hold line(s) (IDS)` beside a live or stale hold. I took the reviewer's first option, not 'an unreadable newest line keeps (b) suppressed': under that option any line-start quote of the template (a round record, a seat note, a review) would suppress (b) on a PR no lane holds, failing toward a review nobody takes, and it would be a second convention beside contractReviewClaims, which skips unreadable rows. Should-fix 4 not built (no code or text change), as ordered.", "files_changed": [ ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md (+2 -2: new L3 scope bound, L28 grading bound, old L99 folded)", "scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs (contractReviewHold per head + unreadable list; header roster and doc comments; hold battery 19 → 23 cases)", "scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs (row hold.unreadable, printed in the hold part; header doc; hold battery 13 → 14 cases; imports CONTRACT_REVIEW_HOLD_TEMPLATE for the fixture)", "contract-review.md unchanged (60/60): L30 already reads per head" ], "line_budget": { "triage-duties.md": "102 → 102 lines (ceiling 102, headroom 0; check-skill-line-ratchet: 'is 102 lines (ceiling 102; headroom 0)'). Every line ≤120 B (widest 120 B, pre-existing).", "added": "L3, 118 B: 「- 本文与技能他处点名分诊之条(复审、摘 `pm:retriage`、约定③ 等)即分诊座位的全部职责。」", "changed": "L28 (was L27), 116 B → 119 B: 「- 窗内无锚红当轮立锚卡、照首触定级,转绿照立并点名承修卡;逾 90 分钟无记录记明断档。」 (was 「- 窗内无锚红当轮立 p0 锚卡,main 已转绿照立并点名承修卡;逾 90 分钟无记录则记明断档。」; 'main ' and '则' dropped to fit, meaning unchanged: the red turned green is still filed, a gap over 90 minutes is still written)", "folded": "old L99, 87 B: 「- 需裁事项攒批(≤5 项/批,每项一行带推荐),一句同意即全链执行。」 → home lanes/director.md 〈职责二:决裁勤务〉 L48 「首批读完前 ≤5 张同族卡即呈;…每张皆呈维护者」 and L56 「一次只开一批:维护者对批 N 回字(一字即可)后…」, under SKILL.md L276 「总监席是唯一呈裁席:决策箱只经本席呈维护者人工裁」; 'with a recommendation' is director L21 「席位写四维分析加推荐」; 'one yes runs the whole chain' is this file's L99 「请示纪律:方向性授权覆盖整条执行链一并做完」. The fold also removes a format conflict: 「每项一行」 vs director L28 「聊天呈批逐卡六项」. L102 「…但攒批不逐项弹」 now reads the director's batch.", "contract-review.md": "60 → 60, not edited", "SKILL.md": "319 / 319, not edited" }, "tests": "Self-tests, before (head 167b0027) → after (head 168cb1e8): node scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs --self-test 316 → 320 cases pass (hold battery 19 → 23; battery floor stays 17); node scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs --self-test 62 cases in 9 batteries → 63 cases in 9 batteries (hold battery 13 → 14). Pins (record-recognisers): (i) 「⭐ an unreadable hold line NEWER than a readable hold on this head voids nothing」: thread = readable hold (id 1) + a later comment quoting the template at a line start (id 7701) reads live off id 1 with unreadable [7701]; the in-case control leg, the same thread without 7701, reads the same id, session, condition and age with unreadable []. (ii) 「⭐ ONLY unreadable hold lines ⇒ unreadable, holding nothing」: two unreadable lines (7700, 7701) read unreadable, both named in gaps, the reading naming the newest (7701). (iii) 「⭐ PER HEAD — a newer readable hold naming an EARLIER head does not clear the older hold on this head」: reads live off the hold that names the current head, in either order (id 1 age 240 min; id 2 age 180 min). Rule implemented: per head, only a new head clears; among readable holds naming the current head the newest is the reading; if none names it, the newest readable hold reads stale. Plus: newest governs among holds on this head; every readable hold on earlier heads reads stale off the newest; every reading carries `unreadable` (empty when absent, listed beside stale). The old 'NEWEST governs … reads stale' case and the old 'unreadable NEWEST line makes the reading unreadable' case were replaced by (iii) and (i)+(ii). Pin (check-owed-reviews, row level): 「⭐ an unreadable hold line NEWER than a live hold on this head voids nothing」: the row stays WAIT, trigger 'none yet', hold live id 6472451890 holding '(b) waited 61 min', hold.unreadable [7701], renderRow prints 'until the last sibling PR merges ⚠️ 1 unreadable hold line(s) (7701)'; control = the battery's existing `held` row (no such line) is WAIT with no 'unreadable' text. No ablation (os-dev.md: scripts are not ablated; the order says the same). Old-path evidence by reasoning plus a read-only probe that mutates no file: base 167b0027 resolved by latestMarkedComment over all rows, so the newest marked comment (7701, unreadable) made the whole reading 'unreadable' and owedReviewRow let (b) fire (hold.state !== 'live'). Probe: `git archive 167b0027 scripts` extracted into the scratchpad, both versions imported side by side on fixture (i): control (readable hold only): base live id=1, branch live id=1 unreadable=[]; (i): base state=unreadable id=7701, branch state=live id=1 unreadable=[7701]. Consumers of the edited scripts (os-dev ⑤), all exit 0 at 168cb1e8: post-stamped.mjs --self-test 735 cases; check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test 401 cases; mailbox-open.mjs --self-test 45 cases in 8 batteries; check:pm-half-states 5066 cases. clause2-line.mjs --self-test printed nothing (no self-test entry; it names record-recognisers only in prose): NOT MEASURED, not counted. No package touched: no build closure (①) or package test (②) owed.", "gates": "All at head 168cb1e8 (the final commit; nothing pushed after). Ordered per the order, exits captured before any pipe: node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0 ('triage-duties.md is 102 lines (ceiling 102; headroom 0)', 'contract-review.md is 60 lines (ceiling 60; headroom 0)'); --self-test exit 0 (164 cases); node scripts/pm/check-skill-id-lint.mjs exit 0 ('105 file(s) clean'); pnpm check:pm-record-recognisers exit 0 (320 / 63 in 9); node scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs exit 0. node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths): exit 0, stderr 'gate list derived from the tree of objectstack-ai/objectstack at commit 168cb1e8', 4 paths vs merge base c5d46341, 40 commands. All 40 run with redirect-then-capture: 39 exit 0 first time; `pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions` exit 3 (PREREQUISITE: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint not built in the fresh worktree) → built under the lock (`OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=os-dev-27370-r2 bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm exec turbo run build --concurrency=2 --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint'`: 'VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 6s · waited 0s', 4/4 turbo cache hits) → rerun exit 0 (61-case self-test, 25 + 9 + 15 examples clean). `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates` ran detached (nohup + tail --pid): exit 0, 'dispatch-gates self-test (fast tier): 1935 cases pass; 7 slow section(s) deferred'. --ran: '✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 40 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 40 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 40 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)', exit 0 (the ran list records the doc-formula rerun's exit). PR check-runs on 168cb1e8, read once right after the push, no waiting: 40 runs, 23 success, 16 skipped by path filter, 1 in_progress (Test Core (1/8)); success includes Lint & Repo Gates, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · repo & tooling gates, Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · ESLint, Lint · CI, release & engine gates, Governed Surface Queue Guard, PR-body guards, Check PR Size, Test UI, Test Core (2/8), every Type Check job; Check Changeset reads skipped on this head (it read success on 167b0027); 0 failures. CI convergence is the seat's to read.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm (Clause-②: no)", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP tool used, read or write", "api_writes": "2 — (1) git push of 168cb1e8 to claude/issue-27370-triage-reads-the-gap-and-hold-line (git transport, 167b0027..168cb1e8, fast-forward, no force); (2) this report: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/27370/comments through scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs. Reads only otherwise (REST GETs of comments 6491338629 / 6491385759 / 6490831569, issue 27047, PR 27468 and its head's check-runs). No PR body PATCH, no label, no ready, no review.", "deviations": [ "Should-fix 1 spelling: neither of the reviewer's two spellings verbatim. 「主干红与确定性队列红」 measured 146 B (134 B even with 'main ' and '则' dropped), over the 120 B line limit; it would also drop the card's 'every window red gets an anchor' for flake queue reds. 「照 L29 定级」 is right in meaning but positional: the new L3 moves L29 to L30, so it would be wrong on landing. 「照首触定级」 points at the same line by content (L30 is the first-touch grading line: 「…首触定 p0…;flake 锚卡判确定性才升」), within 119 B.", "Should-fix 2 premise measured false in its enumerated form: 'this file + contract-review.md + state-machine.md L40 + landing-operations.md 约定③' is NOT the whole remit. Other clauses also assign triage duties: dispatch-runbook.md L8 (pm:blocking in the triage sweep) and its sections 〈紧急卡直接分诊〉 〈分诊席读数成本三则〉 〈分诊两级盘点细则〉; cross-repo-coordination.md rules 1–2, L31, L36–37, L47; external-contributions.md L6; filing-gate.md L29, L34; landing-operations.md L83; seat-post-protocol.md L73; lanes/triage.md (the seat charter). So the restored bound is closed-world: this file plus the clauses elsewhere in the skill that name triage, with the three accepted homes named as examples. It is true by construction and still bounds the seat to written duties.", "Fold choice: the order asked for a genuine fold in the same file. I searched the candidate lines (L3–L8, L10–L14, L19, L25, L43–L55, L61–L70, L91–L102) against SKILL.md, every reference and lanes/*.md. Only old L99 had its whole content at a named home (director charter + SKILL.md L276). Every other candidate had at least one clause stated only here, and dropping such a clause would delete a rule rather than fold one.", "No ablation for should-fix 3, as the order and os-dev.md both say. The control leg is in-case. The old path's 'unreadable' reading is shown by reasoning and by a read-only base-vs-branch probe (git archive of 167b0027 into the scratchpad, no tracked file touched).", "Commit trailers: the harness reminder asked for 'Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5'. I used AGENTS.md L443's model-free pair (Claude-Session + 'Co-authored-by: Claude'), as the branch's earlier commits do. Reported only.", "post-stamped.mjs (dry run and post) prints a re-exec notice that echoes the value of HTTPS_PROXY into stderr (the tool's own output, not a command of mine). Named here by variable name only; the value is not repeated.", "doc-formula-expressions needed a prerequisite build (exit 3 first, then 0 after the build). The --ran list records the rerun." ], "pr_body_stale_sentences": [ "维护者速读「改了什么」: 「窗内无锚的红当轮立 p0 锚卡」 → now 'an anchor graded as at first touch (main full red / deterministic queue red p0, flake raised only once deterministic)'; and the new L3 scope bound is not mentioned.", "维护者速读「风险与回滚」: 「hold 写错格式读作 unreadable、什么都不挡」 → a malformed line holds nothing AND voids nothing; it reads unreadable only when no readable hold exists; beside a readable hold it is printed as ⚠️ N unreadable hold line(s).", "维护者速读「先看」: ② 「newest governs」 → per head; ③ 「triage-duties.md L26–27、L60」 → L27–28, L61 (plus L3).", "维护者速读「两分钟验证」: expected 「316 cases pass」 and 「62 cases pass in 9 batteries」 → 「320 cases pass」 and 「63 cases pass in 9 batteries」.", "What changes, triage-duties.md: 「Item 1, L26–27 (new)」 → L27–28, and 「gets a p0 anchor in the round」 → 'gets an anchor in the round, graded as first touch grades it'; 「Item 2, L60」 → L61; 「L9」 → L10; missing: new L3 scope bound and the folded old L99.", "What changes, record-recognisers.mjs: 「contractReviewHold(...): newest governs (latestMarkedComment, as the hand-off line)」 and 「unreadable (holds nothing)」 → per head (the newest readable hold naming the current head is live; only a new head clears), every unreadable line returned in `unreadable`, `unreadable` state only when every hold line is unreadable.", "What changes, check-owed-reviews.mjs: the `hold` field list lacks `unreadable`; the row now prints ⚠️ N unreadable hold line(s) (IDS) beside a live or stale hold.", "Tests table: after column `167b0027` 「316 cases (+19)… (19)」 / 「62 cases in 9 batteries (+13)… (13)」 → at `168cb1e8` 320 cases (hold battery 23) / 63 cases in 9 batteries (hold battery 14).", "Tests, Pinned: 「newest-governs, per-head clearing」 → per head, only a new head clears, an unreadable line voids nothing and is listed.", "Acceptance notes, first folded-clause bullet: 「The dropped 「全部」 was not true…」 → the bound is restored as L3 in its true closed-world form; add the old L99 fold and its home (director charter 〈职责二〉 L48/L56 under SKILL.md L276).", "Verification: 「Every reading below is from head 167b0027」 and its counts → head 168cb1e8: 40 derived, 40 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED; doc-formula-expressions again exit 3 → built → 0; pm-dispatch-gates 1935 cases.", "Changed-lines details block: triage-duties L27 116 B 「窗内无锚红当轮立 p0 锚卡…」 → L28 119 B 「窗内无锚红当轮立锚卡、照首触定级…」; add L3 (118 B) and the removed old L99 (87 B)." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: none (drift between two governed agent texts, outside (a)/(b)/(c)) · carrier: none · noted, not filed — lanes/triage.md L7 「每 fire 最旧优先」 vs triage-duties.md L24 「排序:队列每轮清空时最新优先;清不空的那一刻起改最老优先」: the two disagree whenever the queue clears every round. For the seat's ACCEPT Acceptance notes. Dedupe words: triage oldest first, newest first when cleared, lanes/triage.md ordering." ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
ACCEPT → PR #27468 comment 6493431422 · head
168cb1e8f651edbb16204f9945c0b53c9603151d· 2026-10-29T09:49Z (triage contract review PASS 6491338629 on167b0027with four should-fix; 1–3 reworked in168cb1e8, delta PASS 6493363887 by the same reviewer; should-fix 4 put to the maintainer as A/B; Tier S — the seat lands it:pr_ready+automerge_enable; booked on merge)objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg
Landed · PR #27468 merged as
ded67bfb5984471bd8d298ce01da296fd90147de(2026-10-29T10:07Z, merge queue,objectstack-fleet[bot]; landing authorised by the maintainer's word 「你应该按照 pm-dispatch 技能审核并落地pr」; Tier S by path — triage contract review PASS 6491338629 on167b0027→ rework168cb1e8(should-fix 1–3) → delta PASS 6493363887; seat ACCEPT 6493431422).origin/mainded67bfb.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.mdL3pm:retriage、约定③ 等)即分诊座位的全部职责。」node scripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs --self-testnode scripts/pm/check-owed-reviews.mjs --self-testState: card closed by the merge (
Fixes);pm:dispatchedstripped 2026-10-29T10:08Z; assignee kept as the record of who carried it. Open for the maintainer (not built here): should-fix 4 — whether trigger (c) also yields to a live hold (A: L30 states (a)(c) still fire; B: a live hold under 24 h suppresses (c) too; the seat recommends A). Noted, not filed:lanes/triage.mdL7 vstriage-duties.mdL24 ordering drift.