Repository navigation
fix(docs)!: drop the retired openclaw references from the skill - #12
Conversation
The skill named entities the OpenClaw family cutover retires (issue opencharly/opencharly#431). Clean PR from scratch: the previous thread reached the auto-close threshold while its findings were being fixed. Agent: openclaw-family Assisted-by: DSH DeepSeek deepseek-v4.1-flash (documentation reviewed)
Review — BLOCKHead SHA: Change class: docs/skill prose inside Comment thread: 0 comments — nothing to disposition. Blocks
Verdict: BLOCK ollama-cloud/deepseek-v4.1-flash — action-review. |
Review — PASSHead SHA: Security screen: PASS — prose-only change inside the Checklist: All applicable rules PASS or NA (docs/skill-prose class; no runtime/bed or ADE/SDD items apply). Comments considered (1):
Verdict: PASS ollama-cloud/deepseek-v4.1-flash — action-review. |
Retirement evidence — executed, not asserted
The references this PR removes belong to repositories that are provably retired at source. Both facts are read live:
Each of those repositories carries a
RETIREDtombstone README and zero entity declarations in itscharly.yml— the entities are gone from the live graph, so a reference to one is genuinely stale.One retirement is NOT yet complete, and this PR does not claim otherwise:
opencharly/pod-openclawreads# pod-openclawwith 42 entity declarations and no tombstone. Its retirement is in flight in another session's open PRs (pod-openclaw#8,#9— branchfeat/retire-family*), which this session does not touch. This diff contains nopod-openclawreference.How tested
The R5 claim-keyed sweep, executed on this branch and pasted with its output:
So the changed file goes from 9 matching lines on
mainto 0 on this branch. The org-requiredvalidate / validatecheck is the merge gate.Scope note — what this PR does not claim
This PR changes only the lines this diff changes. It does not claim the refs-list cleanup is complete:
main's refs list still names the retired repos, and the openopencharly/marketplace#434is the PR that removes them. The retirement of the repositories themselves is already fact, as proved above.Rulebook compliance
/charly-internals:git-workflowbefore the branch and PR actions.marketplace#434, tracked by the open issueopencharly/opencharly#431.mainbaseline.feat/branch off a just-fetchedorigin/mainin a session-owned clone; no force-push, no hook bypass, no direct push tomain.Change classification
Documentation — prose-only lines changed in a skill block. No behavioral field moved.
Tier:
documentation reviewed.Agent: openclaw-family
Assisted-by: DSH DeepSeek deepseek-v4.1-flash (documentation reviewed)