Skip to content

Adding 800G Speed support for portSpeed#5480

Open
ameya-kadam wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
ameya-kadam:main
Open

Adding 800G Speed support for portSpeed#5480
ameya-kadam wants to merge 2 commits into
openconfig:mainfrom
ameya-kadam:main

Conversation

@ameya-kadam
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adding 800G Speed definition for portSpeed

Adding support for 800G Speed for portSpeed
Add support for 800Gb Ethernet speed for portSpeed
@ameya-kadam ameya-kadam requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2026 01:09
@google-cla
Copy link
Copy Markdown

google-cla Bot commented May 16, 2026

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the telemetry port speed test suite to include support for 800G interface speeds. By extending the existing speed mapping configuration, the test framework is now capable of correctly identifying and validating 800G port configurations.

Highlights

  • 800G Speed Support: Added the 800G speed mapping to the port speed configuration map to support higher bandwidth testing.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@OpenConfigBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5480 / 303da34

Virtual Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Job Raw Log
Arista cEOS status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Cisco 8000E status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Cisco XRd status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Juniper ncPTX status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Nokia SR Linux status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Openconfig Lemming status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test

Hardware Devices

Device Test Test Documentation Raw Log
Arista 7808 status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Cisco 8808 status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Juniper PTX10008 status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test
Nokia 7250 IXR-10e status
gNMI-1.5: Telemetry: Port Speed Test

Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds 800Gb speed support to the local portSpeed map in the telemetry port speed test. While this enables telemetry validation for that speed, feedback indicates that the implementation is incomplete. The test's configuration phase relies on a shared library in internal/fptest/portspeed.go which still lacks this mapping, leading to potential failures when the ExplicitPortSpeed deviation is enabled. It is recommended to move the 800Gb entry to the shared library to ensure full support and promote reusability across tests.

ondatra.Speed10Gb: oc.IfEthernet_ETHERNET_SPEED_SPEED_10GB,
ondatra.Speed100Gb: oc.IfEthernet_ETHERNET_SPEED_SPEED_100GB,
ondatra.Speed400Gb: oc.IfEthernet_ETHERNET_SPEED_SPEED_400GB,
ondatra.Speed800Gb: oc.IfEthernet_ETHERNET_SPEED_SPEED_800GB,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The addition of 800G support to the local portSpeed map enables telemetry validation for this speed. However, the test's configuration phase (via fptest.SetPortSpeed at line 221) will still fail to configure 800G when the ExplicitPortSpeed deviation is enabled. This is because fptest.SetPortSpeed depends on the portSpeed map in internal/fptest/portspeed.go, which lacks this mapping. The 800G entry should be added to the shared library to provide complete support and promote reusability across tests.

References
  1. Constants that may be applicable to multiple vendors in the future should be kept general, even if they are currently used in a vendor-specific context, to promote reusability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants