Skip to content

[OSDOCS#15612] Draft apiVIPs and ingressVIPs addition to ShiftStack optional install config params#96941

Open
maxwelldb wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
maxwelldb:shiftstack-vips
Open

[OSDOCS#15612] Draft apiVIPs and ingressVIPs addition to ShiftStack optional install config params#96941
maxwelldb wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
maxwelldb:shiftstack-vips

Conversation

@maxwelldb

@maxwelldb maxwelldb commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s): 4.14+

Issue: OSDOCS-15612

Link to docs preview: https://96941--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_openstack/installation-config-parameters-openstack.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: review relevant code--it's been a bit

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 31, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Thu Jul 31 14:24:50 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://96941--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@maxwelldb maxwelldb changed the title [OSDOCS#INAMINUTE] Draft apiVIPs and ingressVIPs addition to ShiftStack optional install config params [OSDOCS#15612] Draft apiVIPs and ingressVIPs addition to ShiftStack optional install config params Jul 31, 2025
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@maxwelldb: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 21, 2026
@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-4.22 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for enterprise-4.21. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (enterprise-4.22).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 4.22 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate version branch or branches (enterprise-4.x) instead of main.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 3, 2026
@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the request for review from pierreprinetti February 17, 2026 17:54
@jeana-redhat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-5.0 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for branch/enterprise-4.22. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (branch/enterprise-5.0).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 5.0 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate enterprise- version branch or branches instead of main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants