Skip to content

Create gb-ppg.json#528

Open
odscjen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
GB-PPG
Open

Create gb-ppg.json#528
odscjen wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
GB-PPG

Conversation

@odscjen

@odscjen odscjen commented Oct 26, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This list hasn't yet been created but conversations have been had with Crown Commercial Service who are developing it as part of the UK's procurement reforms. They wish to reserve the org-id prefix prior to the list being published. It will be a publicly available list. I expect further details to be available once the list is ready for publication.

Creation addresses #527

@kd-ods

kd-ods commented Oct 28, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks, @odscjen - assign this to me when it's ready and I'll review it.

@yolile

yolile commented Feb 17, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @odscjen @kd-ods, Crown Commercial Service came back to us and asked for the prefix, would you have time to review this PR?

@kd-ods kd-ods left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @odscjen -

Is this list not online yet? It's not https://www.crowncommercial.gov.uk/suppliers is it?

If it is that register, or an updated version of it, it's publishing DUNS numbers as supplier IDs. So we may need to have a chat about it.

Comment thread lists/gb/gb-ppg.json
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
{
"name": {
"en": "Public Procurement Gateway",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"en": "Public Procurement Gateway",
"en": "UK Public Procurement Gateway",

Comment thread lists/gb/gb-ppg.json
"en": "Public Procurement Gateway",
"local": ""
},
"url": "",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No URL yet?

Comment thread lists/gb/gb-ppg.json
],
"sector": [],
"code": "GB-PPG",
"confirmed": false,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"confirmed": false,
"confirmed": true,

Comment thread lists/gb/gb-ppg.json
"licenseStatus": "no_license",
"licenseDetails": ""
},
"meta": {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please complete this section.

@odscjen

odscjen commented Feb 22, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@yolile could you check with CCS if https://www.crowncommercial.gov.uk/suppliers is the correct link for this list?

@odscjen

odscjen commented Apr 4, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@yolile just checking if CCS have confirmed with you if https://www.crowncommercial.gov.uk/suppliers is the correct link to use for this list?

@yolile

yolile commented Apr 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@odscjen, sorry for the late response! Yes, that is the link to use

@odscjen

odscjen commented Apr 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@yolile thanks for the confirmation, @kd-ods looks like we'll need to have a chat about this then as they're still just using DUNS numbers

@kd-ods

kd-ods commented Apr 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@odscjen - yes. Let's chat Mon or Tues.

@kd-ods

kd-ods commented Apr 24, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Here's the org-id DUNS record for reference: http://org-id.guide/list/XI-DUNS .

@kd-ods

kd-ods commented Feb 13, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@odscjen - do we still need to chat about this, or can we just ditch this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants