Added MPL 2.0#1
Open
PeterWhittaker wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
licdiff maintainers, any chance of merging this and making it live at http://oss-watch.ac.uk/apps/licdiff/ ? MPL 2.0 is pretty conspicuous by its absence. I'd suggest further making MPL 1.1 no longer have the strong community attribute. Added: for reference, http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/mpl2 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added the MPL 2.0 by copying the last entry in the master.xml file and changing the license attributes - please note that the reference to the google spreadsheet is the same as the duplicated entry, I don't know if this is an issue, I don't know how to generate a new master.xml, and I haven't attempted to update the google spreadsheet.
As part of making this change, I changed the AKA for the MPL 1.1 from "MPL" to "MPL 1.1"; the AKA for MPL 2.0 is "MPL 2.0".
I am not a lawyer, the values I added are my best understanding of MPL 2.0; it may be worthwhile having them review by counsel. I indicated that MPL 2.0 has strong backing (Mozilla), has a file-based weak copyleft, specifies "my jurisdiction" (it does, for litigation: litigation must occur in the defendant's jurisdiction; it is silent on other questions of jurisdiction); grants patent licenses with a retaliation clause; and is silent on questions of promotion, the privacy loophole, etc.