Repository navigation
Require hook name with rapids-pre-commit-hooks: directives - #177
Merged
rapids-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoOct 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Allowing the hook name to be omitted with these directives was a terrible idea. Require it, and update the tests and documentation accordingly. At the time of this PR, there are very few places where the directive is used without the check name, and this change would not disrupt any of them.
jameslamb
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2026
jameslamb
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I support this. We keep adding hooks here, this extra verbosity is worthwhile to avoid missing things.
Member
Author
|
/merge |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allowing the hook name to be omitted with these directives was a terrible idea. Require it, and update the tests and documentation accordingly.
At the time of this PR, there are very few places where the directive is used without the check name, and this change would not disrupt any of them.