Add article: You're Measuring AI Spend, Not AI Value#88
Open
sneg55 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Adds a new Articles entry on cost-per-verified-outcome (CPVO), a team-level framework for governing AI dev-tool spend. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds one entry to the Articles section:
Why it fits
The list already curates engineering-productivity-metrics articles (e.g. "Flawed Five Engineering Productivity Metrics"). This piece is in the same vein for the AI era: it argues velocity and lines-of-code broke as proxies once AI entered the loop, and proposes cost-per-verified-outcome (CPVO) plus review-tax and verified-share as a team-level dashboard for governing AI dev-tool spend — without per-person leaderboards.
Changes
list.jsonwith"cat": "article"(per the contributing workflow).README.mdby hand to keep the diff minimal (runningnode indexwould have removed several existing entries that are present in the README but missing fromlist.json).