-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Fix StackOverflowError due to non-commuting TransitionFunctionImpl.combineWith #281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
marcus-h
wants to merge
1
commit into
secure-software-engineering:develop
Choose a base branch
from
marcus-h:fixStackOverflowError
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
57 changes: 57 additions & 0 deletions
57
idealPDS/src/test/java/typestate/TransitionFunctionImplTest.java
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | ||
| /** | ||
| * ***************************************************************************** | ||
| * Copyright (c) 2018 Fraunhofer IEM, Paderborn, Germany | ||
| * <p> | ||
| * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the | ||
| * terms of the Eclipse Public License 2.0 which is available at | ||
| * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0. | ||
| * <p> | ||
| * SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 | ||
| * <p> | ||
| * Contributors: | ||
| * Johannes Spaeth - initial API and implementation | ||
| * ***************************************************************************** | ||
| */ | ||
| package typestate; | ||
|
|
||
| import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; | ||
| import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNotEquals; | ||
|
|
||
| import boomerang.scope.Method; | ||
| import boomerang.scope.Statement; | ||
| import boomerang.utils.MethodWrapper; | ||
| import java.util.Collections; | ||
| import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
| import test.TestingFramework; | ||
| import wpds.impl.Weight; | ||
|
|
||
| public class TransitionFunctionImplTest { | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| public void testCombineWithCommutative() { | ||
| TestingFramework testingFramework = new TestingFramework(); | ||
| testingFramework.getFrameworkScope( | ||
| new MethodWrapper(getClass().getName(), "testCombineWithCommutative")); | ||
| Method method = testingFramework.getTestMethod(); | ||
| Statement first = method.getStatements().get(0); | ||
| Statement second = method.getStatements().get(1); | ||
| assertNotEquals(first, second); | ||
| TransitionFunctionImpl firstTransitionFunction = | ||
| new TransitionFunctionImpl(Collections.emptySet(), first); | ||
| TransitionFunctionImpl secondTransitionFunction = | ||
| new TransitionFunctionImpl(Collections.emptySet(), second); | ||
| assertNotEquals(firstTransitionFunction, secondTransitionFunction); | ||
| Weight firstSecondResult = firstTransitionFunction.combineWith(secondTransitionFunction); | ||
| Weight secondFirstResult = secondTransitionFunction.combineWith(firstTransitionFunction); | ||
| assertEquals(firstSecondResult, secondFirstResult); | ||
| // ensure that the behavior of getChangeStatement() is as in the | ||
| // non-commutative implementation (whether this behavior is "meaningful" is | ||
| // debatable, though) | ||
| assertEquals( | ||
| secondTransitionFunction.getStateChangeStatement(), | ||
| ((TransitionFunctionImpl) firstSecondResult).getStateChangeStatement()); | ||
| assertEquals( | ||
| firstTransitionFunction.getStateChangeStatement(), | ||
| ((TransitionFunctionImpl) secondFirstResult).getStateChangeStatement()); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as this is the only ctor using/storing multiple elements it seems to make sense to create a seperate specialized class for it and keep storing the single element here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm what's the benefit of a separate class? The single element case is handled in the ctor above. I could also make this ctor private (if you're worried about the class' API - it would make overriding the combineWith method a bit more cumbersome, though).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
less memory / no linked list overhead - in the cases where we don't need it. I haven't benchmarked it but it seems like a core element that can be generated quite some times.