Skip to content

The nested particle filter of Crisan and Miguez (2018)#243

Draft
Sahel13 wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
nested-pf
Draft

The nested particle filter of Crisan and Miguez (2018)#243
Sahel13 wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
nested-pf

Conversation

@Sahel13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Sahel13 Sahel13 commented May 31, 2026

Reference - Crisan and Miguez (2018)

The main thing to decide is how we want to deal with the parameters. At the moment I have added function types that have an explicit param argument (see cuthbert/npf/types.py).

TODOs

  • The jittering kernel accepts kwargs, but nothing is passed to it in filter_combine
  • Adaptive jittering (jitter only after resampling) - This is problematic, we currently have no way of reliably knowing if resampling has happened or not. The only way I can think of is to have resampling functions return an additional boolean output.
  • More sophisticated tests
  • General documentation and an example

@Sahel13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Sahel13 commented Jun 2, 2026

I'd like to get your opinions on having an explicit param argument @SamDuffield @AdrienCorenflos

@SamDuffield
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry I'm thinking I need to understand the algorithm better. Ideally we can do without explicit param handling, i.e. by just running a PF on a modified SSM on an enlarged space. But I need to understand better if that makes sense for this algorithm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants