Skip to content

Backtracking 2 Solution#1271

Open
indrasena483 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
indrasena483:master
Open

Backtracking 2 Solution#1271
indrasena483 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
indrasena483:master

Conversation

@indrasena483
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Subsets (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • Correct implementation of the backtracking algorithm
  • Clean, readable code with appropriate comments
  • Proper handling of the empty subset case
  • Good variable naming (pivot, path, result)

Areas for Improvement:

  • The time complexity comment could be more precise. While O(2^n) is technically correct for the number of recursive calls, the actual time complexity is O(n × 2^n) due to copying subsets into the result list.
  • The space complexity comment is incomplete - it should mention the O(n) recursion stack space in addition to the O(2^n) for storing results.
  • Consider adding a brief comment explaining the backtracking logic for future readers.

The solution is functionally correct and efficient. The minor improvements needed are in documentation/commenting rather than the algorithm itself.

VERDICT: PASS


Palindrome Partitioning (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean, readable implementation of the backtracking algorithm
  • Good use of comments to explain the action/recurse/backtrack pattern
  • Correct base case handling
  • Proper use of ArrayList copying to avoid reference issues
  • Well-documented with time/space complexity analysis

Areas for Improvement:

  • The space complexity explanation could be more precise. The auxiliary space (excluding output storage) is O(n) for the recursion stack, not O(n^2).
  • Could consider using StringBuilder to avoid creating new String objects on each recursion, though this is a minor optimization for small n.
  • The palindrome check could potentially be optimized using dynamic programming or memoization if the string length were larger, but current approach is fine for n ≤ 16.

Overall, this is a solid implementation that correctly solves the problem with good code quality and clear documentation.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants