@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int set_downmix_coefficients(struct processing_module *mod,
100100 cd -> downmix_coefficients = k_scaled_lo_ro_downmix32bit ;
101101 break ;
102102 default :
103- comp_err (dev , "set_downmix_coefficients(): invalid channel config." );
103+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
104104 return - EINVAL ;
105105 }
106106
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_stereo(struct comp_dev *dev,
128128 return downmix16bit_5_1 ;
129129 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
130130 default :
131- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_stereo(): invalid channel config." );
131+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
132132 /*
133133 * This is a strange situation. We will allow to process it
134134 * in the release code (hoping for the best) with downmix16bit,
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_stereo(struct comp_dev *dev,
161161 return downmix32bit_7_1 ;
162162 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
163163 default :
164- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_stereo(): invalid channel config." );
164+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
165165 /*
166166 * This is a strange situation. We will allow to process it
167167 * in the release code (hoping for the best) with downmix32bit,
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_mono(struct comp_dev *dev,
185185 return downmix16bit_4ch_mono ;
186186 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
187187 default :
188- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_mono(): invalid channel config." );
188+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
189189 /*
190190 * This is a strange situation. We will allow to process it
191191 * in the release code (hoping for the best) with downmix16bit,
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_mono(struct comp_dev *dev,
212212 return downmix32bit_7_1_mono ;
213213 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
214214 default :
215- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_mono(): invalid channel config." );
215+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
216216 /*
217217 * This is a strange situation. We will allow to process it
218218 * in the release code (hoping for the best) with downmix32bit,
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_5_1(struct comp_dev *dev,
234234 return upmix16bit_2_0_to_5_1 ;
235235 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
236236 default :
237- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_5_1(): invalid channel config." );
237+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
238238 return NULL ;
239239 }
240240 } else {
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static up_down_mixer_routine select_mix_out_5_1(struct comp_dev *dev,
251251 return downmix32bit_7_1_to_5_1 ;
252252 case IPC4_CHANNEL_CONFIG_INVALID :
253253 default :
254- comp_err (dev , "select_mix_out_5_1(): invalid channel config." );
254+ comp_err (dev , "invalid channel config." );
255255 return NULL ;
256256 }
257257 }
@@ -379,13 +379,13 @@ static int up_down_mixer_init(struct processing_module *mod)
379379 up_down_mixer -> out_channel_config , up_down_mixer -> coefficients );
380380 break ;
381381 default :
382- comp_err (dev , "up_down_mixer_init(): unsupported coefficient type" );
382+ comp_err (dev , "unsupported coefficient type" );
383383 ret = - EINVAL ;
384384 break ;
385385 }
386386
387387 if (ret < 0 ) {
388- comp_err (dev , "up_down_mixer_init(): failed to initialize up_down_mix" );
388+ comp_err (dev , "failed to initialize up_down_mix" );
389389 goto err ;
390390 }
391391
0 commit comments