Merged
Conversation
Benson0224
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of Changes
This PR introduces several formatting and readability improvements to the TRON DPoS Consensus Mechanism documentation. The goal is to standardize terminology, fix grammatical errors, and make complex concepts easier for developers to digest.
Key Updates
Grammar & Clarity: * Refined sentence structures in the "Overview", "Election Mechanism", and "Incentive Model" sections to improve flow and precision.
Clarified the definition of a slot in the "Core Concept Definitions" table.
Solidified Block Principle Restructure: * Completely reformatted the explanation of the 70% (19 SR) acknowledgment rule into a clear, scannable bulleted list.
Retained and integrated the detailed example referencing "Figure d" to ensure the text still properly contextualizes the provided diagrams.
Note for Reviewers / Design Team
During the review, I noticed a few grammatical typos baked into the images themselves. Since these cannot be fixed via a text PR, the design team may want to update the source images in the future:
Figure b1: "which didn't received" -> "which wasn't received" | "recevied" -> "received"
Figure c: "coudn't" -> "couldn't"
Figure d: "generating by 5 witnesses" -> "generated by 5 witnesses"