Skip to content

docs: #1272 - [Planner]: GPU Condensation Physics Parity#1273

Merged
Gorkowski merged 3 commits into
uncscode:mainfrom
Gorkowski:issue-1272-adw-8046db7b
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

docs: #1272 - [Planner]: GPU Condensation Physics Parity#1273
Gorkowski merged 3 commits into
uncscode:mainfrom
Gorkowski:issue-1272-adw-8046db7b

Conversation

@Gorkowski

@Gorkowski Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Target Branch: main

Fixes #1272 | Workflow: 8046db7b

Summary

Adds the planning artifacts for the GPU condensation physics parity epic. This PR captures the scope, dependencies, implementation strategy, risks, and success criteria for the fixed-shape Warp condensation path, including vapor-pressure refresh, selected activity/surface-tension models, four-substep integration, latent-heat bookkeeping, gas-coupled conservation, and validation gates.

What Changed

New Components

  • .opencode/plans/epics/E4.json - Epic-level plan record for the GPU condensation parity track.
  • .opencode/plans/features/E4-F1.json through .opencode/plans/features/E4-F7.json - Child feature-track plan records covering thermodynamic configuration, physics models, substep integration, latent heat, gas coupling, parity evidence, and documentation.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/* - Epic narrative sections for vision, strategy, dependency map, milestones, risks, and outcomes.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/* through E4-F7/* - Feature sections detailing scope, architecture, tasks, tests, dependencies, and success criteria.

Modified Components

  • Planning state under .opencode/plans/ - Populated the multi-track epic structure and aligned child tracks with their dependency order and validation signals.

How It Works

The epic is structured as a dependency-ordered planning tree:

Issue #1272
    └── Epic E4
         ├── T1: Vapor-pressure refresh on device
         ├── T2: Activity and surface-tension physics
         ├── T3: Fixed four-substep integration
         ├── T4: Latent-heat correction and energy diagnostics
         ├── T5: Gas-coupled conservation
         ├── T6: Parity and graph-readiness evidence
         └── T7: Support contract and documentation

Each child track has a dedicated feature plan with explicit implementation steps and done signals so downstream implementation work can proceed in a controlled order.

Implementation Notes

  • Why this approach: The planning artifacts preserve the shipped container and GPU API boundaries while making the condensation-parity rollout testable and dependency-aware.
  • Deviations from issue: None; the epic scope follows the requested GPU condensation parity direction and keeps unsupported modes out of scope.
  • Future considerations: Implementation will need to land in the low-level Warp kernel path with explicit parity tests before any higher-level GPU workflow claims.

Testing

  • Validation: Planning artifacts were authored to be reviewable against the shipped CPU reference physics and existing GPU kernel contracts.
  • Coverage: The plan includes parity, conservation, fixed-loop, and skip-policy expectations for later implementation tests.

@Gorkowski
docs(plans): add E4 GPU condensation parity planning artifacts
0ffe049 
Add the epic-level and feature-level planning documents for the GPU
condensation physics parity effort. The new plan set captures the
problem statement, milestones, dependencies, risks, and implementation
strategy for the E4 workstream.

Closes uncscode#1272

ADW-ID: 8046db7b
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 13, 2026 01:47
@Gorkowski Gorkowski added agent Created or managed by ADW automation blocked Blocked - review required before ADW can process labels Jul 13, 2026
@Gorkowski

Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Plan clarification questions

Reviewed plans: E4, E4-F1, E4-F2, E4-F3, E4-F4, E4-F5, E4-F6, E4-F7.

Found 51 unresolved decision groups: 1 reviewer-curated question and 50 residual questions/marker groups. These should be resolved before implementation or explicitly assigned to the named phase.

Reviewer-curated — blocking

  • .opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/open_questions.md:14 — Should the M/L milestone labels denote aggregate workstream scope rather than implementation-phase size? Options: treat them as aggregate labels, or split/relabel work so they represent implementation-phase size.

Residual questions by document

.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/open_questions.md:3-8

  • Select the minimum supported E4-F2 effective surface-tension mode.
  • Choose a dedicated Warp struct or validated parallel arrays for numeric thermodynamic configuration.
  • Decide whether the public call returns only whole-call energy or also a named final-substep diagnostic.
  • Define the deterministic allocation rule when simultaneous particle demand exceeds gas inventory.
  • Define which quantities, if any, are differentiable across clamps and inventory gates.
  • Approve numerical tolerances for each physics mode on Warp CPU and CUDA.

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/open_questions.md:3-12

  • When configuration is omitted, fail immediately or require an explicit legacy/static-pressure mode?
  • Use a dedicated Warp dataclass or keyword-only mode and parameter arrays?
  • What fixed parameter width should be reserved for constant and Buck models plus future extension?

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/open_questions.md:3-12

  • Confirm ideal activity is limited to molar fraction.
  • Choose global volume-weighted tension or phase-aware weighting with fixed-shape phase_index.
  • Define numeric mode values and explicit omitted-configuration behavior.
  • Approve scientific rtol/atol per formula and coupled fixture.
  • Recompute composition scratch per launch or use caller-owned reusable buffers?

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/open_questions.md:3-16

  • Expose scratch as keyword-only arrays or an operation-sidecar dataclass?
  • Which omitted scratch arrays may be allocated for compatibility?
  • Use mass_transfer as the total accumulator or separate work and output buffers?
  • Reuse the same environment-property buffers across four substeps?
  • What instrumentation proves no required allocation or hidden synchronization?
  • Which graph-capture/autodiff claims belong in E4-F3 versus E4-F6?

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/open_questions.md:9-16

  • Add opt-in energy as an output keyword or a future result object while preserving the default return?
  • Restrict production energy granularity to (n_boxes, n_species), or retain particle scratch for tests/debugging?
  • Support constant latent heat only or an on-device numeric temperature model?
  • Approve full-physics tolerances separately from energy identity.
  • Confirm the final E4-F3 scratch API consumed by E4-F4.

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/open_questions.md:3-13

  • Define the particle-concentration and box-volume unit convention mapping particle mass to gas kg/m3.
  • Choose a deterministic Warp CPU/CUDA reduction implementation.
  • Expose scratch as keyword-only buffers or the E4-F3 typed sidecar?
  • Approve separate bookkeeping-conservation and physics-parity fp64 tolerances.
  • Reject nonbinary partitioning during host preflight or via device status?

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/open_questions.md:3-14

  • Approve final combined-physics rtol/atol by case.
  • Confirm the API exposes every graph-capture scratch array and define completeness validation.
  • Define supported Warp versions/devices and skip policy for graph capture.
  • Select a smooth-interior differentiable kernel slice.
  • Use conservation rtol=1e-12 alone or pair it with scale-derived atol?
  • Select the canonical issue 1272 evidence-matrix document.

.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/open_questions.md:3-14

  • Finalize public numeric modes, argument/buffer names, return fields, and units.
  • Publish approved physics, conservation, and energy tolerances by device.
  • Confirm stable marker combinations or use direct-file commands.
  • Keep the parity walkthrough in the feature page or create a separate runnable example?
  • Replace existing vapor-pressure caller guidance or retain vapor pressure as explicit scratch/helper state?
  • Decide which graph-capture/autodiff boundaries are stable enough to publish.

Residual marker groups

  • .opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/milestones_timeline.md:8-13 — Assign milestone dates or explicitly mark scheduling as deferred.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/phase_details.md:4-28 — Assign issue IDs for all five phases or explicitly record that issue creation is deferred.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/phase_details.md:4-26 — Assign issue IDs for all four phases or explicitly record deferral.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/phase_details.md:4-30 — Assign issue IDs for all four phases or explicitly record deferral.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/phase_details.md:4-22 — Assign issue IDs for all four phases or explicitly record deferral.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/phase_details.md:4-33 — Assign issue IDs for all five phases or explicitly record deferral.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/phase_details.md:4-28 — Assign issue IDs for all five phases or explicitly record deferral.
  • .opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/phase_details.md:4-22 — Assign issue IDs for all four phases or explicitly record deferral.

No accepted answers were present in workflow spec context, so no unresolved items were suppressed.

Gorkowski
Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026
View reviewed changes

@Gorkowski Gorkowski left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarification required: Should the M/L milestone labels represent aggregate workstream scope, or should the work be split/relabelled so each label represents implementation-phase size?

Copilot AI reviewed Jul 13, 2026
View reviewed changes

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds the planning artifacts for Epic E4: GPU Condensation Physics Parity under .opencode/plans/, defining a 7-track dependency-ordered plan (E4-F1..E4-F7) plus epic narrative sections (vision, scope, risks, milestones, etc.) to guide upcoming implementation work.

Changes:

  • Added the E4 epic plan record and narrative sections describing scope/constraints, dependency ordering, and guardrails.
  • Added feature plan records (E4-F1..E4-F7) and their section documents (architecture, tasks, testing strategy, success criteria, etc.).
  • Established testing/validation expectations for Warp CPU baseline, optional CUDA parity, conservation, and documentation guardrails.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 112 out of 112 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
.opencode/plans/epics/E4.json Epic E4 plan metadata record
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F1.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F1
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F2.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F2
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F3.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F3
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F4.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F4
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F5.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F5
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F6.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F6
.opencode/plans/features/E4-F7.json Feature plan metadata for E4-F7
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/appendix.md Epic E4 appendix/references
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/change_log.md Epic E4 change log
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/child_plans.md Epic E4 child-plan index
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/dependency_map.md Epic E4 dependency graph
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/governance.md Epic E4 governance/decisions
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/implementation_strategy.md Epic E4 implementation strategy
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/milestones_timeline.md Epic E4 milestones/timeline template
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/open_questions.md Epic E4 open questions
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/outcomes_guardrails.md Epic E4 outcomes + non-goals
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/risk_register.md Epic E4 risk register
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/scope_constraints.md Epic E4 scope/constraints
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/success_metrics.md Epic E4 success metrics
.opencode/plans/sections/epics/E4/vision_problem.md Epic E4 vision/problem statement
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/architecture_design.md E4-F1 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/change_log.md E4-F1 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/dependencies.md E4-F1 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/documentation_updates.md E4-F1 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/implementation_tasks.md E4-F1 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F1 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/open_questions.md E4-F1 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/overview.md E4-F1 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/phase_details.md E4-F1 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/risk_register.md E4-F1 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/scope.md E4-F1 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/success_criteria.md E4-F1 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F1/testing_strategy.md E4-F1 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/architecture_design.md E4-F2 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/change_log.md E4-F2 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/dependencies.md E4-F2 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/documentation_updates.md E4-F2 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/implementation_tasks.md E4-F2 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F2 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/open_questions.md E4-F2 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/overview.md E4-F2 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/phase_details.md E4-F2 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/risk_register.md E4-F2 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/scope.md E4-F2 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/success_criteria.md E4-F2 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F2/testing_strategy.md E4-F2 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/architecture_design.md E4-F3 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/change_log.md E4-F3 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/dependencies.md E4-F3 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/documentation_updates.md E4-F3 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/implementation_tasks.md E4-F3 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F3 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/open_questions.md E4-F3 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/overview.md E4-F3 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/phase_details.md E4-F3 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/risk_register.md E4-F3 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/scope.md E4-F3 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/success_criteria.md E4-F3 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F3/testing_strategy.md E4-F3 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/architecture_design.md E4-F4 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/change_log.md E4-F4 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/dependencies.md E4-F4 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/documentation_updates.md E4-F4 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/implementation_tasks.md E4-F4 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F4 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/open_questions.md E4-F4 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/overview.md E4-F4 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/phase_details.md E4-F4 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/risk_register.md E4-F4 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/scope.md E4-F4 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/success_criteria.md E4-F4 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F4/testing_strategy.md E4-F4 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/architecture_design.md E4-F5 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/change_log.md E4-F5 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/dependencies.md E4-F5 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/documentation_updates.md E4-F5 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/implementation_tasks.md E4-F5 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F5 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/open_questions.md E4-F5 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/overview.md E4-F5 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/phase_details.md E4-F5 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/risk_register.md E4-F5 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/scope.md E4-F5 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/success_criteria.md E4-F5 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F5/testing_strategy.md E4-F5 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/architecture_design.md E4-F6 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/change_log.md E4-F6 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/dependencies.md E4-F6 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/documentation_updates.md E4-F6 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/implementation_tasks.md E4-F6 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F6 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/open_questions.md E4-F6 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/overview.md E4-F6 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/phase_details.md E4-F6 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/risk_register.md E4-F6 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/scope.md E4-F6 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/success_criteria.md E4-F6 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F6/testing_strategy.md E4-F6 testing strategy section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/architecture_design.md E4-F7 architecture section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/change_log.md E4-F7 change log section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/dependencies.md E4-F7 dependencies section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/documentation_updates.md E4-F7 documentation updates section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/implementation_tasks.md E4-F7 implementation tasks section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/infrastructure_reuse.md E4-F7 infrastructure reuse section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/open_questions.md E4-F7 open questions section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/overview.md E4-F7 overview section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/phase_details.md E4-F7 phase breakdown section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/risk_register.md E4-F7 risk register section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/scope.md E4-F7 scope section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/success_criteria.md E4-F7 success criteria section
.opencode/plans/sections/features/E4-F7/testing_strategy.md E4-F7 testing strategy section

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread .opencode/plans/epics/E4.json Outdated
Comment on lines +8 to +13
"owners": [],
"start_date": null,
"target_date": null,
"completion_date": null,
"last_updated": null,
"dependencies": [],
Comment thread .opencode/plans/features/E4-F2.json
Comment on lines +11 to +14
"completion_date": null,
"last_updated": "2026-07-13",
"dependencies": [],
"section_files": {
Comment thread .opencode/plans/features/E4-F4.json
Comment on lines +11 to +14
"completion_date": null,
"last_updated": "2026-07-13",
"dependencies": [],
"section_files": {
Comment thread .opencode/plans/features/E4-F5.json
Comment on lines +11 to +14
"completion_date": null,
"last_updated": "2026-07-13",
"dependencies": [],
"section_files": {
Comment thread .opencode/plans/features/E4-F6.json
Comment on lines +11 to +14
"completion_date": null,
"last_updated": "2026-07-13",
"dependencies": [],
"section_files": {
@Gorkowski
docs(plans): resolve E4 clarification questions
5870c84 
Document code-backed decisions across E4 and all child plans, clarify deferred scheduling and aggregate milestone sizing, and align machine-readable dependency metadata with the plan graph.
@Gorkowski

Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

E4 clarification resolution

Resolved the reviewer-curated question and all residual question groups across E4 and E4-F1 through E4-F7 in commit 5870c8437.

Key decisions:

  • Treat milestone M/L labels as aggregate workstream estimates; child XS/S labels remain implementation-phase estimates.
  • Support static per-species plus global single-phase volume-weighted surface tension; defer phase-aware weighting.
  • Use keyword-only typed operation sidecars for thermodynamic configuration and reusable scratch without changing physical Warp*Data schemas.
  • Fail before mutation when required configuration is omitted; do not silently reuse stale/zero vapor pressure.
  • Preserve the default two-item condensation return and expose optional signed whole-call energy through caller-owned (n_boxes, n_species) storage.
  • Follow CPU inventory-limit semantics: account for evaporation, then proportionally scale positive demand per box/species.
  • Set initial fp64 parity targets to rtol=1e-10 with scale-derived atol; keep conservation separate at rtol=1e-12 and atol=max(1e-18, scale * eps).
  • Limit autodiff claims to an out-of-place smooth-interior slice; clamps, inventory gates, and in-place mutation remain unsupported.
  • Explicitly defer milestone dates and phase issue IDs until implementation issues are generated and scheduled.

Metadata fixes:

  • Added E4 last_updated, inbound E1/E2/E3 dependencies, and structured child-plan references.
  • Added the documented dependencies for E4-F2, E4-F4, E4-F5, and E4-F6.

Validation:

  • adw plans validate E4: all 28 plan files valid.
  • Confirmed no unchecked items remain in any E4 open_questions.md file.

@Gorkowski Gorkowski added request:plan-fix Request AI to apply follow-up fixes for planner output adw:in-progress ADW workflow actively processing - remove to re-trigger and removed blocked Blocked - review required before ADW can process labels Jul 13, 2026
@Gorkowski

Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

🤖 Agent Developer Workflow

  • Description: Plan-fix workflow: analyze comments -> revise plans -> re-review -> ship -> generate issues
  • ADW ID: 300ac127
  • Current Phase: Workflow completed successfully
  • Started: 2026-07-13T02:13:38.511134Z
  • Last Update: 2026-07-13T02:34:37.323026Z

Current Status

  • ✅ Workflow completed in 20m 58s

Workflow Plan

  • ✅ Analyze Comments (at 2026-07-13T02:15:59.525300Z)
  • ✅ Revise Plans (at 2026-07-13T02:17:52.412415Z)
  • ✅ Re-split Phases (at 2026-07-13T02:18:56.242389Z)
  • ✅ Review Architecture (at 2026-07-13T02:19:59.933202Z)
  • ✅ Review Sizing (at 2026-07-13T02:22:19.952559Z)
  • ✅ Review Testing (at 2026-07-13T02:24:39.787642Z)
  • ✅ Review Dependencies (at 2026-07-13T02:25:57.808891Z)
  • ✅ Review Completeness (at 2026-07-13T02:28:16.326978Z)
  • ✅ Consistency Check (at 2026-07-13T02:30:45.683618Z)
  • ✅ Ship Fix (at 2026-07-13T02:32:16.453065Z)
  • ✅ Generate Issues (at 2026-07-13T02:34:36.560840Z)
📋 Recent Activity 
[2026-07-13T02:25:57.808912Z] Completed step 7/11: Review Dependencies
[2026-07-13T02:25:58.588094Z] Starting step 8/11: Review Completeness
[2026-07-13T02:28:16.326994Z] Completed step 8/11: Review Completeness
[2026-07-13T02:28:17.063480Z] Starting step 9/11: Consistency Check
[2026-07-13T02:30:45.683643Z] Completed step 9/11: Consistency Check
[2026-07-13T02:30:46.520438Z] Starting step 10/11: Ship Fix
[2026-07-13T02:32:16.453086Z] Completed step 10/11: Ship Fix
[2026-07-13T02:32:17.450168Z] Starting step 11/11: Generate Issues
[2026-07-13T02:34:36.560864Z] Completed step 11/11: Generate Issues
[2026-07-13T02:34:37.322852Z] Workflow plan-fix finished: 11/11 steps completed
🔍 Archived Updates 
[2026-07-13T02:13:38.532129Z] Workflow plan-fix started with 11 steps
[2026-07-13T02:13:40.456978Z] Starting step 1/11: Analyze Comments
[2026-07-13T02:15:59.525323Z] Completed step 1/11: Analyze Comments
[2026-07-13T02:16:00.286985Z] Starting step 2/11: Revise Plans
[2026-07-13T02:17:52.412437Z] Completed step 2/11: Revise Plans
[2026-07-13T02:17:53.170036Z] Starting step 3/11: Re-split Phases
[2026-07-13T02:18:56.242413Z] Completed step 3/11: Re-split Phases
[2026-07-13T02:18:57.122115Z] Starting step 4/11: Review Architecture
[2026-07-13T02:19:59.933218Z] Completed step 4/11: Review Architecture
[2026-07-13T02:20:00.648217Z] Starting step 5/11: Review Sizing
[2026-07-13T02:22:19.952581Z] Completed step 5/11: Review Sizing
[2026-07-13T02:22:20.777253Z] Starting step 6/11: Review Testing
[2026-07-13T02:24:39.787668Z] Completed step 6/11: Review Testing
[2026-07-13T02:24:40.509166Z] Starting step 7/11: Review Dependencies

This comment is automatically updated as the workflow progresses

@Gorkowski
docs(plans): incorporate review decisions into E4 plans
7862904 
Update the E4 feature plan sections to reflect review decisions on
milestone labeling, typed keyword-only sidecars, latent-heat handling,
and autodiff scope.

This keeps the planning artifacts aligned with the latest implementation
and testing guidance before the ship step.

Closes uncscode#1273

ADW-ID: 300ac127
@Gorkowski

Gorkowski commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Fix Summary

Updated the E4 plan set to reflect the review decisions for milestone labeling, typed operation sidecars, vapor-pressure handling, condensation return shape, inventory-limit behavior, parity/conservation targets, and autodiff scope.

Changes Made

  • Clarified M/L labels as aggregate workstream estimates.
  • Kept child XS/S labels as implementation-phase estimates.
  • Aligned E4-F1/E4-F2/E4-F3 around keyword-only typed sidecars.
  • Updated E4-F1 to fail before mutation when required config is missing.
  • Preserved the default two-item condensation return in E4-F4.
  • Updated E4-F5 to follow CPU inventory-limit semantics.
  • Tightened E4-F6 parity and conservation targets.
  • Marked clamps, inventory gates, and in-place mutation as unsupported for autodiff.

Review Comments Addressed

  • Clarification request: 4681268072
  • Decisions applied: 4953812130#decision-1 through 4953812130#decision-8
  • Where explicit inline comment IDs were not available, the plan was updated from the recorded decision notes.

Files Changed

Plan sections and manifests across E4, E4-F1 through E4-F7 (112 files total).

Automated fix by ADW workflow 300ac127

@Gorkowski Gorkowski merged commit 8afaade into uncscode:main Jul 13, 2026
7 checks passed
@Gorkowski Gorkowski deleted the issue-1272-adw-8046db7b branch July 13, 2026 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

adw:in-progress ADW workflow actively processing - remove to re-trigger agent Created or managed by ADW automation request:plan-fix Request AI to apply follow-up fixes for planner output

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Planner]: GPU Condensation Physics Parity

2 participants

@Gorkowski