Skip to content

README: sharpen "Why this exists" and restructure use cases by audience#14

Merged
vingrad merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/readme-why-and-use-cases
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

README: sharpen "Why this exists" and restructure use cases by audience#14
vingrad merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/readme-why-and-use-cases

Conversation

@vingrad

@vingrad vingrad commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Two content changes to the README, following the new flow diagram (#13):

"Why this exists" rewritten as an argument. The section asserted its conclusion in staccato one-liners followed by a flat ten-item feature list. It now names the three failure modes of one-off LLM recommendations — no accountability, no reaction to change, no learning — which map one-to-one onto the engine's provenance/versioning, signal-driven replanning, and outcome loops. Closes with a hook naming the audience and linking to the use cases.

"Example use cases" → "Use cases", organized by who needs it. Instead of a list of ten domains, the section now answers "what do we provide" for each of three builders:

  • AI agents that act — MCP server, machine-actionable moves (DAG dependencies, kill criteria, fallbacks), signal-driven replanning, webhooks.
  • Decision-support products — ranked alternatives with rationale, domain packs, live data sources, materiality thresholds, the calibration/backtest learning loop.
  • Anything that must answer "why did it recommend that?" — input snapshots, full provenance, immutable history, outcome addressing.

Every claim corresponds to a shipped mechanism (MCP server, webhooks, dde calibrate, backtest metrics, domain packs, source enrichment).

vingrad added 2 commits June 11, 2026 01:07
The section asserted its conclusion in one-liners and followed with a
flat ten-item feature list. It now names the three failure modes of
one-off LLM recommendations - no accountability, no reaction to change,
no learning - which map onto the engine's provenance/versioning,
signal-driven replanning, and outcome loops. The feature keywords
survive embedded in prose, and "explores" no longer undercuts the
production-oriented tagline.
"Example use cases" was a flat list of ten domains. Replace it with a
"Use cases" section organized by the three builders the engine serves -
AI agents that act, decision-support products, and anything that must
answer "why did it recommend that?" - each with the concrete mechanisms
it gets: MCP tools and machine-actionable moves with kill criteria for
agents; ranked alternatives, domain packs, live context, materiality
thresholds and the calibration/backtest loop for products; input
snapshots, provenance, immutable history and outcome addressing for
audits. "Why this exists" gains a closing hook linking to the section.
@vingrad vingrad merged commit 97780b0 into main Jun 10, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant