🧪 Improve Test Coverage for Engine.greedyNextToken#24
Conversation
This commit adds a test for the `decodeStep` function and significantly expands the existing tests for `Engine.greedyNextToken` in `echo-core-zig/src/inference/engine.zig`. We now explicitly test how `greedyNextToken` handles situations like all negative logits and ties. Co-authored-by: ulac000000 <132948319+ulac000000@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed was that
Engine.greedyNextTokenand the closely relateddecodeSteplacked comprehensive tests or explicit edge-case handling guarantees in the testing suite.📊 Coverage:
Engine.greedyNextTokenis now tested against ties and all negative logits.decodeStepis also tested to ensure it returns an array matching the vocab_size.✨ Result: Test coverage for
echo-core-zig/src/inference/engine.zigis improved and we've verified it manually using a standalone test context to prevent build regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13390554028346578525 started by @ulac000000