Skip to content

🧪 [Testing Improvement] Add explicit test for HashMap resize logic boundary#30

Open
void0x14 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jules-hashmap-resize-test-9739498768836451984
Open

🧪 [Testing Improvement] Add explicit test for HashMap resize logic boundary#30
void0x14 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jules-hashmap-resize-test-9739498768836451984

Conversation

@void0x14
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@void0x14 void0x14 commented Apr 9, 2026

🎯 What: The testing gap addressed is a missing unit test directly verifying that the HashMap resize() function is automatically triggered when reaching the initial capacity limit based on the load factor (count >= len * 3/4).
📊 Coverage: The scenario now tested validates exact behavior crossing the resize threshold (inserting exactly up to threshold where capacity = 8, checking capacity remains 8, then inserting the next element to trigger resize and verifying capacity scales to 16), asserting that all previously stored data maintains its keys and values post-resize.
Result: Enhanced test coverage that explicitly checks initial expansion bounds and validates memory allocation operations triggered implicitly via put().


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9739498768836451984 started by @ulac000000

…undary

Addresses the missing test for HashMap resize logic in `echo-core-zig/src/data/hashmap.zig` by testing the scenario where inserting an item specifically triggers a resize based on the 75% load factor rule, and asserting that all previous items remain intact afterwards.

Co-authored-by: ulac000000 <132948319+ulac000000@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant